/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>10592919
Yeah, it's definitely a misnomer. They like to frame themselves as liberators, when in reality they are totalitarians. They think because they champion fag rights, it somehow negates the rest of the shit they do.

Because liberal = (((freedom)))
Aka let's invite all the poor muslims and pajeets to our country because everyone deserves equality

>>10592942
OH NO NO NO NO NO
http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/education/ny-metro-critics-blast-city-for-hiding-desegregation-study-20180806-story.html

>>10592919
at one point in history the Democrats were the conservative party and the republicans the socialist party

I forgot when it was but they traded places

>>10592939
Do you guys have a third party that is liberal in customs and economically? Not really a libertarian party, but a true liberal one.

>>10592991
How the fuck does this shit happen

>>10593022
Lyndon Johnson decided he wanted the niggers voting for democrats for over a hundred years.

american liberals are fiscally to the right of most conservative parties around the world.

>>10592919
>Is the "liberal" term applied only for customs and not for economic freedom?
The word has no real literal meaning anymore when it's used in the context of left wing vs. right wing. If you identify as a liberal in America in 2018 there's a good chance you are actually an anti-free speech fascist.
>>10592991
Federalist would be a more accurate term.
>>10593002
A third party that actually means anything? No.

>>10593068
And republicans, being socialists, didnt celebrate that now there was another left wing party?

Or is it because Marx hated niggers and socialists back then knew that?

But wasnt Lincoln that freed the slaves a republican? This makes no sense, son.

>>10593092
Im actually asking because bernie sanders is a true socialist and seems to be getting more momentum.

Y'all gonna get Venezuela'd in a couple decades.

>>10592919
The “liberal” term refers to being liberal with restrictions on government intervention. Conservatives traditionally wanted less government intervention and to have things handled mostly at state level and private sector.

>>10593092
>Presidential Candidate Sen. Elizabeth Warren blocks your path.
>>10593097
The Republicans were never "left wing" by modern standards.

>>10593097
Republicans weren't socialist, they were simply further left economically than democrats. Democrats then went even further left than the republicans were while the republican position didn't really move for a while though its gravitated further right since just out of a lack of other places for right-wing people to go.

>>10593114
>seems to be getting more momentum
Isn't that because he's likely to die soon?

>>10593114
Sanders has no chance of actually becoming president, he's good at firing the base up which is what democrats need right now to try to take more Senate seats.

Left/right and liberal/conservative mean nothing. There is only ZOG and anti-ZOG. ZOG tries to hide this.

>>10593002

Libertarians

>>10592919
yanks are illiterate OP, they have confused promiscuity with liberality.

>>10592919
because of fucking amerifags i know have to call myself libertarian instead of liberal or people get confused.

>>10593459
>i know have to call myself libertarian instead of liberal or people get confused.

Are you implying americans know the difference?

>>10592939
this is considered critical thinking in America