/biz/ - Business & Finance

What we know from above. Dom steill and DApps Inc team work closely with Salesforce for over a year. Dom and Dapps team follow and retweet chainlink

Now listen to this video carefully
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qvukJ3LnvUs

>>10584560

Go on brother.

>>10584560
This piece of shit token will soon be under 20 cents again. JFYI.

Dapps Inc - The company provides design, consulting and advisory in addition to an off-the-shelf suite of products that include SDKs, middleware solutions for writing to Salesforce and private blockchains as well as industry-specific applications to greatly improve internal and external business processes.

I'm actually more qualified to talk about this than most anons.I'm employed with a cyber-techno machinations company, I do a lot of security analyst programming type work. Open source, decentralized, APIs, partnerships, you name it. We'd be one of the first companies in line for something like Chainlink, if the decentralized smart contract space had more value over traditional data exchanges. There's a catch though, an underlying flaw more deeply embedded in the bedrock of LINK than the very code itself. The flaw is with the concept, and it's this: Companies won't actually go through the hassle of trusting their data API's through crypto.

Now I can already hear your keyboards going frantic, but hear me out. /biz/ hates banks, and traditional data providers. But actual companies, businesses, and investors do not. There's an old saying you might have heard of: "If it ain't broke, don't fix it!". The idea that any of our bosses would give us the go ahead if we approached them to put our companies valuable data in a smart contract on a cryptocurrency called Chainlink, that they've never heard of, we'd be laughed out at best and fired on the spot at worst. We already have API data buyers and providers we trust.

'But Chainlink is trustless!' I hear you cry, but is that really a good thing? Just listen to the sound of it. Businesses don't want to spend millions of dollars on something that is trustLESS, they want something trustFUL. 'But the reputation system!', doesn't that defeat the whole point of your coin? If companies only trust nodes with high reputation, what's the difference between trusting banks and data providers that already have high reputation, but in real life not on a computer screen.

The fact is, LINK is going to share the same fate as ETH will. A lot of 'real world application' hype, with a lot of 'crypto world application' reality. Only, this billion supply coin isn't going to come close to the $1k that Ethereum hit. Happy gambling though anons.

He worked at apptus before starting DApps
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ugUhVPGI8_g

>>10584560
Based and redpilled.

>>10584569

"does your package take external data"

a - "Exactly we'll do telematics data into salesforce to trigger events in smart contracts.."

Over 10 pocs

>>10584560

Seal of certification. The only thing that concerns me is how they call it their own and Link's name is not used.....

>>10584569
>that boomer at the end who asks about external data

nothing burguer

He's describing CHAINLINK...WE'RE ALL GONNA MAKE IT $2500 EOY IS FUD

SALESFORCE HAS THEIR OWN UI USING CHAINLINK AS THE MIDDLEWARE

Salesforce Implementation Architect only follows 100 twitter accounts

https://twitter.com/JanetStimac/following

Sergey Nazarov
Smartcontract
Chainlink
Linkpool
and 3 fucking 3 chainlink fan accounts are included in the 100..

>>10584560

Never forget
https://twitter.com/SergeyNazarov/status/965781130539511809

Nice finds, OP. I honestly wonder if there will be an opportunity like Chainlink again. It perfectly traverses the boundary between public and private applications. You look at front end enterprise solutions like the one Dom is talking about and it's likely that it would be very difficult for retail investors to profit from that, even if they could see the value in it. I mean, at the very least you could invest in Ethereum, but those solutions will be running across the EVM and hyperledger and probably even emerging platforms so it's still a gamble. LINK just sits in between all of it. It honestly boggles my mind that it's not a top 20 project already.

>>10584621
If all these companies can utilize chainlink in the background more power to them.

>>10584666
>those digits
Satan says no

>>10584666

The combination of FUD and shilling and constant presence on /biz/ really turns people off. I only started looking in Link threads a few months after coming here, went all in recently, thought it was all a meme. Not many people know about /biz/ though even.

I doubt there will be any crypto investment like Link again in our lifetime.

for fun go to page 54
https://issuu.com/cryptobizmag/docs/crypto-biz-magazine-issue-02-150dpi

Was gonna make my own thread for autistic dot connecting. Found this to steemit today, is he talking about link? https://steemit.com/cryptocurrency/@markdelong/the-blockchain-will-destroy-the-world-as-we-know-it

>>10584698
F A S H I O N

>>10584666

Checked. And no. We've had BTC and ETH representing decentralized store of wealth and decentralized smart contract computation. LINK is the last fundamental layer from which the new world will be built, and it will survive the shift from Ethereum to whichever competing platform ends up taking over, meaning it will be rivaled only by BTC itself for value on the other side of banks rolling out DLT projects and mainstream adoption picking up the pace.

Don't get me wrong, there will be many moonshots to come, and plenty of interesting projects that will get made that transform the world. But many of them will be built on Chainlink, and its going to be a long time before we see anything as paradigm shifting as the Chainlink network again at a protocol level like this. We'll see transformative consumer applications, but in terms of "the rails" LINK is a once in a lifetime find.

>>10584740
What would really get me rock hard is if the bitcoin devs implemented smart contracts at a higher level than they currently are. Etherium has been a total scam imo ever since their decision to fork after the Dao hack.

>>10584582
old pasta

>>10584560
Good work OP. Since the Accord speculation was confirmed to be true, I’ve found it a little easier to entertain these theories. Link will moon something fierce.

>>10584795
I’m inclined to agree with you on the DAO hack. Ideologically it makes me nervous for future systems that are built on top. Unfortunately, bitcoin smartcontracts cant be as expressive as decentralized virtual machine contracts. But I want to ask you why it even matters? The point is to be paid in bitcoin, so would you not be okay with at least a network like chainlink triggering that payment? And the contract itself be executed in ethereum or something like ethereum?

bump

>>10584840

It'll moon, and it'll then keep having follow up moons.

Salesforce = moon

Mainnet = moon

Microsoft = moon

Facebook = moon

Zeppelin OS release = moon

Accord release = moon

Hyperledger support = moon

SWIFT pilots start with a handful of banks = mega moon

SWIFT full release = the price singularity

If you're not planning to hold until at least 2020 regardless of how fast this climbs before then you just don't get it.

>>10585099

Checked. Based. Redpilled.

>>10585099
How will it moon if people don't invest in the project though? Normies are what made the 2017 bullrun possible...and most of the normies got burned badly in 2018.

>>10585157
Whom

>>10584920
I'd be "fine" with it, but it's just not ideal. The entire point of crypto is immutability, so using eth defeats the entire purpose. Long term I'm bullish af for link, just not on the etherium network.

I'd like bitcoin to add real smart contracts b/c they're the gold standard, no other reason.

>>10585158
like the poster said. you dont get it. this isnt about "normies". its about b2b relationships. this network launch will rip your face off once enterprises get onboard and start using it.

>>10585158

>How will it moon if people don't invest in the project though? Normies are what made the 2017 bullrun possible...

be honest... how new are you?

>>10585165
Dom Steil

>>10585158
Pretty sure Goldman Sachs could buy all bitcoins at these prices. It'll be the bankers and big businesses that get things rolling, then normies will fomo in again @ $950/link and get burned yet again.

>>10584730
Sergey dresses like he used to troll /b

>>10585196
>>10585168
Big business will be given tokens OTC by Sergey from the 650 million that is out of circulation.

>>10585167
And what about another smart contract platform (aside from Ethereum), along with chainlink, with payments being made in bitcoin. Would that be equal?

>>10585158
Fuck... I dont understand how you could be so clueless.. Its already been explained over and over and fucking over again how chainlink is going to gain traction and eventually moon. I really fucking hate stupid fucks like you. Goddamn.

>>10585219
Why is sergey sucha big business corporate shill
Handouts to corporations really?

>>10585289
>on a business board
>upset that a startup is working with other billion dollar enterprises to implement a solution that could make blockchain and cryptocurrency useful to its fullest potential.

>>10584653
bah gawd....

BUMP THIS MAN

>>10585227
I guess it'd be fine too. It just seems superfluous to have another blockchain for SC because bitcoin refuses to upgrade theirs.

>>10585219
Even if this is true, it doesn't matter because there's thousands of smaller players that will be forced to buy on the open market

>>10584653
Implementation architect isn't a unique job, she's a nobody sadly, we've debunked this before

>>10585320
I dont want the existing big banks to be at the center of that revolution

I want a decentralized currencies not large banking establishments
The banks should go bankrupt
They shouldnt be given millions of link

>>10584653
Look at the fucking 'diversity' all over her twitter, though. Oosh.

is $0 link enough to make it?
fml

http://archive.is/A6xM4

Something big is coming

>>10585158
This isnt about normies. This is about large scale financial institutions. This is smart money. You would need mountains and hordes of normies and neets to even rich an eigth of the capital these guys have.

>>10585095
>thank you for our great communities amazing support
>communities
that fucking dumb gook slut is shitting up this project with her 2nd grade english writing skills

>>10585158
Look at the names of the companies listed there. You really think normie fomo is going to be more significant than money from multi billion dollar industries using link?

>>10585522
can you keep the discussion on topic? you have to go back poltard.

>oh, look, it's another connect the dots episode with ChainLink, where nothing of real substance happens in the end

>>10585593
that's not how you greentext, ranjeet
and stop trying to fud, no one's buying it anymore

>Amazon has been moving off Oracle for several years and has plans to complete the transition next year, according to people familiar with the matter.
>Oracle has been unable to keep up with AWS and other vendors in cloud infrastructure.

>>10585532
Those industries will be given or sold tokens at a discount OTC from the 650 million out of circulation...I have a hard time imagining big wigs will make a binance account to purchase tokens.

>>10585630
So amazon is coming up with their own solution

>>10585632

Good thing they work with SWIFT...

>>10584653
>https://twitter.com/JanetStimac/following
It was confirmed in a past thread that this Janet character is not really an important figure, her job title is a meme.

>>10585636

>>10585632
It's impossible that's why its hard to imagine.

>While not providing details on the upcoming product, Benioff said that he hopes to "have a blockchain and cryptocurrency solution for Salesforce and for all of our customers" before Dreamforce – a conference the company will host in San Francisco from Sept. 25 to 28.

https://www.coindesk.com/salesforce-blockchain-product-ceo/

>>10585868
I just wish for once a big wig would say chainlink.

>>10585878
how can it be more fucking obvious

>>10585892
I know... but just mentioning something like big macs would put a smile on my face.

>>10585987
Let's try to get him to make a McDonald's reference

>>10585868

HE LITERALLY SAYS CRYPTOCURRENCY NOT JUST BLOCKCHAIN.

THERE CAN BE ONLY BE ONE COIN.

>>10585868
It's what mulesoft has been working on, not chainlink... So delusional

Lets Love Link

>>10586182
Rare

>>10586182
Love you Steve! Keep up the good work

>>10586053
...is this actual fud

>>10586182
Damn, I need to finish this animu.

Also another connection brought up multiple times is consensys. Here is consensys following mark oblad and mark oblad tweeting aaron wright

https://twitter.com/markoblad/status/994420767289946112

he would have no idea who they are or vice versa if there wasn't a connection

>>10586244
Also w/ Consenys. Take a look at

https://kaleido.io/

>>10586182
Let make it together Damu

FUCK ALL THIS READING BETWEEN THE LINE SHIT

Has Rory confirmed if Sergey will be speaking at dreamforce

>>10585878
Serious

>>10585517
a good read desu

>>10584581
Hope so, need more

>>10586907
ctrl f = chainlink
0 results

why is this garbage link related?

>>10586855
Give it time.

>>10586635
Read between these lines:

----------
You're a retard
----------

>>10584582
I'm actually more qualified, a bunch of 4channers, you know the drill.

>>10584560
>dig with me
Fuck no.

I’ve been 90% in Link since the presale and ICO, and this retarded digging and dot connecting is going to kill any chance of a moon mission.

>>10585085
The Salesforce building looks like Sergey's shirt! Confirmed!

>>10585219
Those big businesses can increase the value of their LINKs by just purchasing some extra LINKs on the open market. Took me some time to realise this.

>>10586010
ari paul did. When asked about where to buy chainlink tokens, he twitted that the guy needs to leave money behind mcdonald's toilet bidets and "ask no questions", referencing sergey's big mac addiction

>>10584698
Bullish af

I know they completed a PoC for SWIFT and all but can chainlink even solve the oracle problem or do we have to wait until mainnet to find out?

>>10584653
She also follows drumpf. Fake and gay

>>10588073

lmao

Janet Stimac just started following Dapps inc today on twitter.

>>10587171

KEK

>>10587585

We are prepping it - people don't believe yet - one day they will realize it was all true and collectively we are going to blow our loads - don't you want to get off with me?

>>10586260

Ya I don't know how more people haven't picked up on this platform... or the direct connection to Amazon.

Amazon, Facebook, Microsoft. All of their blockchain tech is being built on the Chainlink network with SDKs and integration suites branded and built for various industries.

>>10585878
Tom Gosner at SXSW and on his twitter he said he was a fucking link marine.

>>10590262
Holy fuck...she is on biz 100% hi Janet

>>10590559
Janet if you are on biz and Salesforce will use Chainlink start to follow Steve Ellis next

https://twitter.com/streamOfCo

>>10585271
Based and redpilled

Janet's just a /biz/raeli. It's the exact same as Alesky contributing to the code base.

guys just face it we all fell for a meme..

>>10590893
>>10590579
someone message her kek

>>10591181
It is time for government intervention
How could they let this happen