/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>10470079
I’m getting chainlink vibes

>>10470079
Bunch of 4channers tried to force it as /ourcoin/, during the presale ico phase of chainlink there was a minimum requirement of 300eth to enter the presale. Bunch of anons pooled up together and shared presale links to fill them with their eth.

Coin continued to get shilled and pumped up and hyped for the sibios event that link was attended, whole event turned out to be a flop chainlink had a presentation in a room of like 18 people next to the public toilets, literally no news or partnership came from the event and the coin dumped back to below ico prices and created 1000's of bagholder anons.

Now during this alt bull run lots of anons and took advantage of this and shilling this coin to all the new money and newfags that joined in december and don't know this story.

The coin is HEAVILY manipulated and the supply is dried up from huge whales who accumulated below ICO price to create a artificially lower supply (a lot like REQ) and these people have so much room to dump on all of you faggots to still be in profit when the time comes.

In regards to actual project that chainlink aiming to achieve it's nothing more than a basic json parser for smart contracts, would take like a day to add to ethereum by itself.. literally making links whole concept pointless and definitely no need for a token. Would take a lot longer to get it working with bitcoin but the bitcoin core devs would be able to work out the solution a lot quicker than chainlink will, think that's something worth noting that literally nothing is completed and you're literally just buying a whitepaper, they have only 2 developers and they don't communicate at all with no proven background on either, in fact sergey was involved in a project before chainlink called NxT that he since been abandoned until it was took over by a new developer team

>>10470115
this

>>10470115
Are you gonna post this in literally every chainlink thread?

>>10470079
Do you mean the next overhyped centralized scam? at least this time I'm not going to give my money to chinks

>>10471115
He suffers heavily from being a beta

Nice fud

>>10470079
Chainlink, $500 by 2020

>>10470213

>>10471669
This unironically

>>10470115
You're right. This board ignored Bitcoin and Ethereum. Why should anyone trust them when they adopt a favorite coin? This board is full of failures.

>>10472883

Are you fucking joking? This board loved Ethereum and were shilling it about as much as Link back when nobody knew about it and it was under $10. This board didn’t even exist when BTC was in its early days but it was created partly as a way of giving BTC posts a home since posters on other boards were complaining about the constant BTC shilling, FUD, and memes.

>>10472989
This. The only reason ETH is no longer /ourcoin/ is because the whole fucking board got rich and never came back

>>10473053
Same with Bitcoin tbqhwyfamalam, and it'll happen again with link

>>10471115
he wants the MANIAC treatment

>>10473617
>>10473617
>and it'll happen again with link

lol no.

>>10473053
Bunch of 4channers tried to force it as /ourcoin/, during the presale ico phase of chainlink there was a minimum requirement of 300eth to enter the presale. Bunch of anons pooled up together and shared presale links to fill them with their eth.

Coin continued to get shilled and pumped up and hyped for the sibios event that link was attended, whole event turned out to be a flop chainlink had a presentation in a room of like 18 people next to the public toilets, literally no news or partnership came from the event and the coin dumped back to below ico prices and created 1000's of bagholder anons.

Now during this alt bull run lots of anons and took advantage of this and shilling this coin to all the new money and newfags that joined in december and don't know this story.

The coin is HEAVILY manipulated and the supply is dried up from huge whales who accumulated below ICO price to create a artificially lower supply (a lot like REQ) and these people have so much room to dump on all of you faggots to still be in profit when the time comes.

In regards to actual project that chainlink aiming to achieve it's nothing more than a basic json parser for smart contracts, would take like a day to add to ethereum by itself.. literally making links whole concept pointless and definitely no need for a token. Would take a lot longer to get it working with bitcoin but the bitcoin core devs would be able to work out the solution a lot quicker than chainlink will, think that's something worth noting that literally nothing is completed and you're literally just buying a whitepaper, they have only 2 developers and they don't communicate at all with no proven background on either, in fact sergey was involved in a project before chainlink called NxT that he since been abandoned until it was took over by a new developer team

>>10473640
yeah it will, it'll just take 3-5 years. if you're willing to hold through like a boss, then you'll make it, i promise.

>>10473640
At this point if you are still not holding at least a suicide insurance stack after it's been officially announced that IBM and R3 were going to use LINK as their primary oracle service you're simply chosing to stay poor

>>10473053
>implying you can ever leave this place
An egregore summoned requires something in return, anon. You're here forever now.