/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>10415684
$2000 lol
Really need some more LINK. I do digital art anime/manga style commissions. I'll draw your waifu for $30 worth of LINK!

>>10415684
what if they singularity is the collective suicide of all chainlink holders when it goes to 0 and they realize the only people who bought this scam were other biz neet faggots? No normies fell for your stupid scam, your shilling is too obvious. The kikes finally found out how to kill all incels was to convince them all to put their net worth into chainlink and send it to 0. Have fun with your future sudoku

$3-4


ez

20$

>>10415699
Post Sergey waifu as proof.

>>10415699
What a fucking loser

>>10415792
At least he does SOMETHING. Thats like better than 90%

>>10415684
$15 usd and I'm a millionaire

$66
I need more link to bring that down

$40

$100, so just waiting for EOY.

Could sb tell me why is this shit so special that you are talking about it all day long? i am reading this bord since jan 2018 and everyday i am seeing same stinky linky shills. So allright anon, please tell me why should i invest in LINK, redpill me.

$500,000
>t. 2 link holder

>>10415684
166$

>>10415699
Get lost, Pajeet begger.

12$. Ez pz

>>10415684
Once Chainlink has a market cap of 17 billion.

>>10415684
$4k

0.08

>>10416060
kys

>>10416081
You have around 70k linkies?

>>10415684
But that doesn't take into account btc price

>>10415763
>>10415699
this

>>10416438
I'm waist deep in this shitcoin. I'm ready.

>>10416505
I am rescinding my offer because it is clear no one wants to do business with me.

Unironically $1

$1.18

>>10416528
Draw the new marketing director, Adylen Zhou.

>>10416557
I don't work for free.

>>10416559
Faggot

>>10416568
nigger

FAT
A
T

>>10416570
Let's see some of your previous work.

>>10416559
You need to make a name for yourself first anon, cant expect people to just gib you money cause you can draw funny pictures. Sergey waifu as requested as a sample. You can do it!

Thirteen dollars. Not unrealistic imo

>>10416559
So we're just supposed to pay you without knowing what your work looks like? If you give us a Sergey waifu as proof of your services, perhaps you will get some additional business.

>>10416578
No, I don't have anything that isn't easily traceable to my social media accounts and I don't want to get doxxed. I saw what you did to that guy who posted his house. You guys are brutal

>>10416589
No, I was going to link you guys to my shop, but I realized that's actually a bad idea lol

Hard to know because my stack will increase with staking making my $1M target lower and lower.

>>10416589
If only we had some sort of digital trustless self executing agreement that will hold the funds in escrow.

>>10416608
Your work is good.

200, I really hope Link reach 50 one day.

>>10416641
thanks, you too.

>>10415684
>$50
>he thinks the MC of a coin will be as big as the whole market

>>10415684

you will be HOMELESS, faggot

Just one mill? Roughly $17 and some change

>>10416673

>>10416673
That'd because "the whole market" right now is just pajeets, boomers, and /biz/. Things will be different when everyone realizes that Google bought Chainlink.

You won't stay a millionaire unless you buy real money.... gold and silver

>>10416752
>google bought chainlink

source?

>>10415684
$33,34

>>10416037
Why should anyone redpill you. There’s a wealth of knowledge on this thing called the internet. Take it or leave it but don’t expect anyone to spoon feed you.

>>10415684
$100

At $30
European millionaire at $35

>>10416791
I'm referring to a future event.

>>10416880
>European millionaire
Isn't that an oxymoron? All the bottom-feeders will eat you alive and demand it all be redistributed

>>10416882
any basis for this claim?

76$

>>10416900
I can see into the future. Take it or leave it, but when it happens, remember the green ID anon who told you about it.

>>10416888
Actually you Americans are way more cucked. I only pay 1,5% yearly tax on my stocks and crypto. Doesn’t matter how many trades I make. Also they are planning to completely stop taxing dividends here.

Holding over 104k
At $9.60 I’ll be at a million.

>>10416943
I can see into the future as well, thats why I hold LINK

would be cool if google bought link

>>10416980
My powers might be a little stronger than yours, but yeah good to meet another seer

3.75 :))))))

$0.01

>>10416673
huh, at 50$ with a recovered market is would barely be in the top 15 with 15b marketcap

>>10415684
about 40$ after taxes

>>10415684
I have 3.7k could someone tell me? I genuinely don't know what the number is kek

>>10416673
At current circulation that would be less than 6% of the whole market you dip. Now imagine 10% and a $2 Trillion market cap. We're talking $600+/LINK

>>10417738
Now let's consider the WEF is correct and we reach $8 trillion market cap by 2025/2027. If LINK is just 5% of that and there are 500,000,000 in circulation, the price of 1 LINK would be $800. Now think if we bubble to $10-20 Trillion? If LINK captures 10% of the crypto market? If a large percentage is locked up in nodes? $1000 EOY is obviously a meme, but by the mid-2020's it's going to be a reality.

>>10416009
Same, linkbro

>>10415699
Post sergey waifu with eth wallet and ill give you 40 link if its good

>>10416771
Please do tell me more about your real money. When was the last time you paid for something in gold or silver?

>>10416752
but google already bought codius, why they need LINK?

>>10415684
Fuck off

>>10417955
DTNL

>>10415684
Unironically, $66.66

>>10415684
All these predictions always assume a best case scenario, but let's try to be conservative:

If LINK gets to NEO's current market cap and all tokens are circulating it will be $2 per LINK

And NEO is a big project

If LINK get's to Ripple's current market cap and all tokens are in circulation it will be $18 per LINK. But Ripple is fucking huge - it's the third biggest crypto.

For $1000 LINK would have to be almost TEN TIMES Bitcoin's current market cap

But, of course, overall crypto market cap will grow. And LINK is a great and necessary project that clearly is in deep with a ton of partnerships.

I'm just trying to temper expectations a little bit. Most estimates over $50 assume an absolute best case scenario where the following is CERTAIN:
- LINK will be a top 10 coin
- Crypto MC will go to $10 Tn+

I'm not saying these things won't happen but it's by no means guaranteed. Even $10 LINK would be life changing for me desu. People thinking they're guaranteed to make it with 1k stacks or that it's only a matter of time before LINK hits $1000 or even $100 are optimistic at best and deluded at worst

this isn't FUD and if you don't hold LINK you are a fool

>>10415684
$100... still accumulating

>>10415699
Kill yourself you tucking faggot

>>10415684
same my dude

I have 9.5k linkies, will I make it /biz/?

>>10418105
Market cap doesn’t mean shit.

>>10418145
>tucking
end your fucking life you pathetic waste of space.

>>10418105
>and all tokens are circulating
Most people that give over $10 estimates assume that the vast majority of LINKs will be stakes and thus not in circulation.
How much of that is true remains to be seen, but if the tokens gets usage then it WILL have a sizable portion of the supply locked.
If it doesn't get usage then it will crash to zero like other useless shitcoins after the great purge
>t. stinky since ICO

>>10416975
germany: you hold 1 year and your gains are taxfree

>>10418079
for this to happen at current prices, LINK would have to be the second biggest crypto

>>10417682
Probability of LINK being top 15 MC * probability market recovers to over $1Tn = ?

>>10417738
>that would be less than 6% of the whole market you dip
as good as LINK is, that's 6% of the ENTIRE crypto market
>>10417738
>Now imagine 10% and a $2 Trillion market cap
What if LINK doesn't capture 10% of the ENTIRE crypto market? And even if it does, what if that market never makes it to $2 Tn?
>>10417792
>Now let's consider the WEF is correct
What if they're not?
>>10417792
>If LINK is just 5% of that
Again, 5% of the ENTIRE crypto market - this is a tall order!
>>10417792
>and there are 500,000,000 in circulation
could happen, but could also go to full 1,000,000,000 in circulation
>>10417792
>Now think if we bubble to $10-20 Trillion? If LINK captures 10% of the crypto market?
Again, what if it doesn't?

I'm honestly not trying to FUD but reading these posts there's just so much "if this happens and that happens and that happens and this happens" when nothing is guaranteed.

LINK is a brilliant project and IMO the best investment in crypto RN but the way you're all talking anyone would think it's a done deal already. Why can't you be a bit more conservative/realistic in your predictions and if it exceeds them you will be happy. Otherwise, you're just setting yourself up for disappointment if it never reaches $1000 (which is $1Tn market cap and I know MC is a meme but still this is more than Apple or Google or Berkshire Hathaway or whatever)

Be fucking realistic

>>10418244
>holding some shitcoin a whole year

Wew lad i hope you don't make use of that

>>10415684
$10

>>10418257
>Be fucking realistic
$1000 EOY is realistic. When you realize that it's actually possible, no matter how unlikely, the fact that even a slight possibility exists means literally anything could happen. You can influence the future in your favor through the power of positive thinking and affirmation.

>>10415699
Give me a sample of your work, I may bite

>>10418257
We're all banking on adoption and therefore a vastly reduced circulating reply. Furthermore link itself depends on smart contracts being adopted. If this occurs then the market cap for crypto will have to balloon. If smart contracts aren't adopted, then we're dead in the water. But we're all pretty sure smart contracts will be adopted.

$90

>>10418340
Read the thread, I'm not doing it because I don't wanna be doxxed lol

Can somebody tell me why chainlink is different from any other crypto? I actually can't understand what these niggers are describing when I look it up.

>>10418386
Then how will I try to get you to draw fetish porn for link

>>10418386
>implying people would care if you post on the fake money section of a Canadian ice hockey image forum

>>10418444
sometimes I do requests on drawthreads across various boards like /a/ and /v/

>>10415684

>measuring in USD

>>10418507
kys

>>10415684
What exchange Can I buy link on? I’m gonna fall for the meme

>>10415684
39,8$

>>10418496
I'm going to monitor this thread until you post a sample then, idk why you're afraid to post here if you post stuff on other boards.

>>10415684
135.99€
I fucking know that number by heart

>>10415684
$33.33

>>10417738
>>10417792
>>10418257

I made another thread to clarify this: >>10418814

>>10415684
$4

>>10418965
good thread and spreadsheets

it's certainly possible to see $100 LINK but a lot of stuff would have to happen

I'd rather go conservative and say $2Tn total crypto market cap with all LINK in circulation and 1% of total MC for $20 per LINK

Still an amazing return and life changing money for me

Upper realistic limit for me is 500m in circulation, LINK at 5% of a $5Tn MC for $500 per LINK. But so much stuff would have to fall into place for that. Possible though.

>>10415684
150.15

>>10417731
divide 1000000 by 3500 you utter brainlet. How the fuck did you figure out how to buy it?

>>10415684
4 dollars before taxes. Feels good man

$1,000

>>10418524
>What exchange Can I buy link on? I’m gonna fall for the meme

You don't 'buy' link

>>10418329

>>10419255
You don't "buy" LINK.

You become LINK.

>>10418397
no thx, leave the board faggot

>>10419113

LINK is literally going nowhere. Give up, move on, Buy ADA or another coin run by actual engineers and professionals and stop holding on to your stinky linkies.

You WILL regret it. Screencap this.

$100

But Im starting to believe thats a meme and $10 is probably the most optimistic target with a perfect case scenario

>>10419263
>You become LINK.
false. you are either born a linkmarine or you die a nolinker.

at a little under $166.666 repeating

planning on adding more in the coming weeks but im pretty poor.

hoping the rocket doesnt leave the station just yet. give me at least another fiscal quarter or two before the singularity ;_;

>>10419263
exactly or link becomes you
linkdrome
the cube is the new flesh

>>10419296
You either die a Linkie, or you fud long enough to see yourself become a nolinker

$3 For me. Is this achievable ?

>>10418257
>Link will never be 1000$
Hurr what if it doesn't not reach reach $1000
Mc is a meme though
Chainlink tokens are not shares of a company like Apple.
It's almost a whole different asset class of utility token which doesn't have a standard yet.

What's the market cap of USD or the euro?

$10 but just $3 will be life changing what are the chances EOY?

>>10419364
Wondering this myself. Really not sure after the disappointing website launch

>>10419255
Thanks- I’m not currently on Binance so I’ll send some over
I will become link

3 bucks if it rises at the same rate as ZRX.

>>10419405
Easy. Check em

>>10416037
DYOR faggot!

$88.
I thought you only needed 10k link to make it?

Looks like 3k sats is the new top for this shitcoin.
Reminder: total supply = 1 billion shitlink
Reminder: 1k sats eoy

>>10415684
33.3

>>10419518
Didn't your kindergarten teacher rape you as a kid?

>>10416037
>reading this board since jan 2018
>Still doesn't know about link
>still doesn't own any link
FUCK, Anon what the fuck have you been doing? You come here to post BRAAAP/trap images or something?

>>10416037
buy Mobius instead

>>10419558
Please stay on topic, faggot.

>>10419598
And you only have a few years left to live

>>10419558
yes and I have an abiding terror of crayons

>>10419612
Wtf are you talking about? Kys

>>10419631
You're not rkg

>>10418166
yes

>>10419401
>Mc is a meme though
>What's the market cap of USD or the euro?
This isn't an argument. I agree MC doesn't tell you everything but you can't just ignore it like it means literally nothing.

MC is a meme therefore LINK will be worth $1000 isn't an argument
>>10419401
>Chainlink tokens are not shares of a company like Apple.
I know. But does this automatically mean LINK tokens are going to be worth $1000
>>10419401
>It's almost a whole different asset class of utility token which doesn't have a standard yet.
I know. But the implication of what you're saying is that this means LINK will definitely be worth $1000+ when, as you say, there is no standard yet.

I'm a LINK holder myself and expressing healthy scepticism of these huge figures people throw around on here. You're using the uncertainty as positive proof that LINK will go to $1000 whereas I'm seeing the uncertainty for what it is and saying I don't know where this thing is going

>>10419424
Wow. That's still up. I thought they fixed the typos. Did they miss that, or are they still fixing the site?

>>10419641
Stop stalking me, fucking loser.

>>10419612
that's why you need to buy mobius

>>10418244
yeah #hodlgang germany checking in.

>>10419671
tits or get out of bed and go or a walk

>>10419671
You're not even her. I bet it make you feel funny down there to larp as a girl. Do you dress up like one too?

>>10415684
$33

20

>>10419700

$50

$5 which is practically guaranteed.

Feels weird knowing I can just sit on my ass for a year or two and become a millionaire.

>>10419742
You sound like a fucking virgin. Now stfu and go obsess over some insta thot.

Tokenomics
people still have some incorrect assumptions about the remaining 650M not in circulation. Half goes to the team.
Half are used to pay the nodes. Rory has stated this.
Now would it make sense for a company that's been around for 4 years to dump their portion of links on the market with the price so low? No.
The half used for node rewards will be locked until they are used to pay node operators, namely, us.
Node operators will be paid a dollar amount in link, depending on the number of transactions it preforms.
If you were to be paid $100 dollars in link, would you rather link be $100 (1 link payment) or $0.50 (200 link payment), I hope
you said 200 link payment.
Now arbitrage will not likely last long as the market catches on, link will not remain a low price given a return on Xlinkies exceeds the other investing opportunities
by a significant amount.
I acctually don't think current price is all that far off from a healthy but normal rate of return we may see in the early stages of the network. For example, If you have
A monthly return: 20,000 link in a node (@$0.25) and it rewards 100 link (or $25), or annualized 1200 link = $300. $300 return on initial $5000 investment = 6%.
Now where it gets interesting is when more transactions are processe through the node (more businesses are onboarded), if price were to remain stable you would recieve more link.
So now lets say 20,000 link returns 300 link a month ($75), but that would be an annualized 18% return, this should get people interested therefore buying up link
and driving up the price of link which lowers the amount of link you recieve as reward (but keeping the $ amount of the reward the same).
So in this example lets keep 6% an equillibrium, the price would rise to $0.75 per link and your 20,000 link are now worth $15000 rather than $5000 and your previous rewards that you recieved at $0.25 you could now sell
for $0.75. Continue this processes until link = $1000 :).

around $200 or so, but i'll probably give in and sell at $10-20.

$21,276

>>10419954
Does mommy know you like to steal her underwear and wear them when she's gone? Is she accepting of your lifestyle?

>>10415684

$0. I am already millionnaire.
Hint : I don't own any ChainLink, it is shit.

Best regards.

>>10418105
>crytpo market hits 20 trillion this year
>it's all fucking LINK

tokenomics my man, tokenomics

I'm just gonna hodl until 2023 and hope it's at least $50 by then.

>>10420850
Please tell me you're also holding bitcoin.

$22 from my stack of 60,000

Is $22 possible, do you think, what timeframe would it take? Thanks.

>>10415684
$.10

>>10420903
Ah yes, this reminds me of the old indian proverb where ranjeet and pajeet are sitting on a hill overlooking mumbai. ranjeet says to pajeet, "let's run down there and shit on the street". Then pajeet says, "no no ranjeet, lets walk down there and shit on all the streets". Do you see, sir?

>>10420885
Yes plus eth and some other normie coins like LTC

>>10415684
Ausfag so only $32 USD for me to be a millionaire over here

>>10416882
Kys

>>10415684
$12

>>10416037
It is so fucking obvious by your diction that you’re a fucking pajeet. Please go back to begging for sex on facebook you streetshitter

>>10419631
A namefag telling someone else to kts
>delicious

>>10416037

fuck off

14.88 per link makes me a millionaire

>>10416037

>>10416026
LOL... You guys are horrible and soo mean. but you crack me up. hahaha.