[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]

/biz/ - Business & Finance


View post   

>> No.10391681

Wow, that looks actually pretto good

>> No.10391694
File: 23 KB, 258x245, 1531382389148.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10391694

>>10391654
why invest in a meme scam coin when you can invest in oracle directly? Link is unironically fucking dead. Refute this if you can [you can't]

>> No.10391705
File: 147 KB, 750x546, 1526140567091.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10391705

>mfw they read the whitepaper with more resources

>> No.10391731

>>10391694
Wouldn't it be funny if Oracle was the one solving the oracle problem?

>> No.10391758

"Oracle’s service is built using the open source Hyperledger Fabric, so it can integrate with other blockchains based on open standards."

Hyperledger is using chainlink

>> No.10391773

>>10391758
No it’s not.

>> No.10391813
File: 76 KB, 1383x1072, this_kills_the_chainlink.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10391813

haha dumb linkies thought they were the first.

They did not know that the big playere were developing cheap and functional oracles behind closed doors.

But sir, developing is expensive. They would rather buy some overpriced memecoin from some chink exchange, instead of doing it themselves.

>> No.10391845

>>10391731
>Wouldn't it be funny if Oracle was the one solving the oracle problem?

The thing is there is no oracle "problem". It is a made up problem created by desperate bagholders.

>> No.10391868

>>10391845
Well yeah, trust is expensive. Introducing the cost of trust back into trustless systems is asinine when there could be price discovery around a trustless version of the same thing.

>> No.10392455

>>10391773
Improve your fud, chainlink demands a higher level of fud than your average pajeeted scam coin

>> No.10392649

>>10391758
Can you show me the dots? Besides ibm logo on same page

>> No.10392687

>>10391654
Linkies were BTFO if they ever thought they'd see a swift ROI (no pun). Decentralized trust-less oracles are a good idea, but we're far away from demonstrating a need for them.
>>10391845
>The thing is there is no oracle "problem". It is a made up problem created by desperate bagholders.
If Link can provide a brain-dead way to integrate off-chain data with a great UI/UX, the need for a decentralized oracle network will become real. That is a big IF though. The barrier for entry is the R&D of having to integrate existing systems into a custom blockchain per application. Eliminating is the key to adoption.

>> No.10392861

Roll dubs and I delete ChainLink database then kill my self

>> No.10392890

>>10391758
Psst...just let the autists fud link so we can continue to accumulate... they're good at it

>> No.10393164

>>10392890
>>10392649

>> No.10393188

>>10391813
>oh look it’s centralized oracles again.

Your intelligence really shows.