/biz/ - Business & Finance

I will never sell. Only with my LinkPool contribution I'm going to be gaining $120,000 each day in two years. This shit is ridiculous.

>>10231127
you are not allowed tell people. people like you WILL BE DEALT WITH

>>10231127
Even in a 20T market cap fantasy land, this wouldn't be possible. Do people actually believe in hyperbole like this, or is it reverse fudding?

>>10231127
the devs work on it every day

>>10231127
Binance listed Request for free too

>>10231226
>Market cap matters for a currency

Tell me what the Market Cap of the British pound is please?

>>10231213

He doesnt know about the shadow fork

Yes $1000 EOY is fud! The real outcome is 1000 suicides EOY, which is worth far more than $1000

>>10231226
>Even in a 20T market cap fantasy land, this wouldn't be possible. Do people actually believe in hyperbole like this, or is it reverse fudding?
Dear lord, I hope not. A $20 trillion market cap is fantasy for any cryptocurrency imo.

>>10231475
>20T for one cryptocurrency

>>10231418

>Barely a few thousand wallets holding anything
>Of the few that do 1000 kill themselves, likely those with substantial amount
>Massive publicity ensues due to drama, but most tokens are now locked out of circulation, price skyrockets

It just can't fail.

>>10231475
I meant 20T for all of crypto.

>>10231127
I've always felt this way to OP.

I think LINK (or whatever project succeeds in doing what LINK is trying to do) will bring about the technological singularity. There's really no end to what it can do, so long as it has a web API to make agreements based on. The internet of things will be a reality, and smart contracts will drive it.

There's simply no way to accurately measure the value at this point.

>>10231127
Refute it.

If you don’t have the technical know how to try out the testnet, this article does a good job explaning what can be done on it. https://medium.com/@jonnyhuxtable/smartcontract-test-net-and-technology-evaluation-b5023d750f6f

With that said, nodes are not incorporated in the testnet, ethereum contracts do not self execute, data is sourced from ONE website with a json parser and added into smart contract and the contract does nothing with this data.

What is this testnet even testing? It is adding centralized data source into a smart contract completely bypassing the token and node utility outlined in the whitepaper and the smart contract cannot read the data and execute based on the results even with only ONE data source. All this does is add outside data into a smartcontract which has been done, it is easy to do and not a new breakthrough. The system still relies on a centralized data source, skips over nodes (making your investment worthless at this point), and requires somebody to execute the contract themselves completely defeating the purpose of the entire system. What are they testing?

>>10231127
I don't believe LINK will succeed but i want to join the cult. i may buy in just for the memes and to prevent suicide in case it moons.

>>10231127
I did as you told me, you dirty little girl, and pulled myself off twice when I read your letter. I am delighted to see that you do like being fucked arseways. Yes, now I can remember that night when I fucked you for so long backwards. It was the dirtiest fucking I ever gave you, darling. My prick was stuck up in you for hours, fucking in and out under your upturned rump. I felt your fat sweaty buttocks under my belly and saw your flushed face and mad eyes. At every fuck I gave you your shameless tongue come bursting out through your lips and if I gave you a bigger stronger fuck than usual fat dirty farts came spluttering out of your backside. You had an arse full of farts that night, darling, and I fucked them out of you, big fat fellows, long windy ones, quick little merry cracks and a lot of tiny little naughty farties ending in a long gush from your hole. It is wonderful to fuck a farting woman when every fuck drives one out of her. I think I would know Nora’s fart anywhere. I think I could pick hers out in a roomful of farting women. It is a rather girlish noise not like the wet windy fart which I imagine fat wives have. It is sudden and dry and dirty like what a bold girl would let off in fun in a school dormitory at night. I hope Nora will let off no end of her farts in my face so that I may know their smell also.

>>10231127
>Staking 100 Links will give you $6,000/day in 2020

Wew, I can’t wait to be making $1,200,000 a day!

If link is 3 dollarydoos EOY i will be happy.

>>10231767
If LINK really takes off this is completely reasonable.

>>10231840
If Link is $.95 I will be happy. I just want my money back...

>>10231967
no its not.

>>10231738
I think this is where a lot of people get confused, there is no "cult", just a collection of people who are amazed at what they are seeing in front of them and have done enough research that they've accepted that this is the only guaranteed moon mission in a sea of shitcoins so they are amusing themselves 'til main net. Almost everything else is stupidity of the uninformed or FUD for shits and giggles. This is the last time I'm gonna explain this

>>10231967
I’m going to pocket $200k a day and donate the $1MM to charity.

>>10232025
based on what? No one has a way to evaluate this. I'm willing to give you that it's still a longshot. but it's looking less and less of a longshot every single day.

If the entire world runs on smartcontracts (this is basically inevitable), whichever network that processes them is going to have trillions of transactions per day.

LInk might fail miserably, but you'd have to be braindead not have a stake in it. I personally beleive this will have immeasurable utility for derivatives contracts and you will see most of derivatives being handled via LINK within a year.

>>10232031

So if you’re so sure it’s mooning will you please garauntee you’ll neck yourself if it doesn’t :)

>>10231756
based

>>10231967
Maybe if Link takes off and remains the prefered decentralized oracle until we start stripmining in the asteroid field this is completely reasonable.

>>10232097
Why would I do that? I'll just move on, oh no. I swear people stress themselves out over nothing, if you can't afford to lose it that isn't my problem.

>>10231724
our patience

>>10232118

Cause you guaranteed it, so you’re not that sure, got it,in that case neck yourself now for endless baseless shilling of your shit coin

>>10232031
>>10232118
this

>>10232145
dude sorry you didn't buy btc or eth last year
maybe you should go do something about it, or just buy chainlink and wait, poorlet

>>10232210

I sold BTC at 18k, why would I buy more

>>10231127
>The thousands of use-cases it has from enormous to small companies.

Even if LINK succeeds and everyone wants to use it there is no blockchain that can support it at the moment, and faggot vitalik would rather badger dance and jerk off in public instead of getting his shitty blockchain together. Other blockchains are even more of a joke so don't tell me about eos zilliqua or other scam

Can't wait for /biz/ flags. All pajeets in these threads.lmfao

>>10232145
I'm not shilling shit I just discuss things that interest me, also please don't act like /biz/ is some really great place for discussion. The only decent threads are the rare ones about global trade and the state of the economic system, everything that involves peoples' investments is retarded and you know it.

>>10231127

Thanks just sold 100k

>>10232243

So you guarantee the success and aren’t shilling lmao

>>10231377
>he wasn't already holding link during the shadow fork

>>10232267
So are you mad about link thread or are you autistically hung up on enthusiasm expressed because hyperbole is an alien concept that your autist brain can't conceive of?

>>10232312
threads*

>>10232312

Not mad about anything I just want all the baselesss shillers to unironically neck themselves

>>10232346
You keep saying baseless like it means something in this context

>>10232233
it's amazing that everyone managed to sell at 18k, hats off. but idk man, maybe you have enough money now, cheers then no reason to brigade a thread about the most speculative and fucked up token in existence. enjoy that 18k

Wait... If node operators are paid in link, are those links being created out of thin air? WTF
someone please answer

>>10231226
>reverse fudding
You mean shilling?

>>10231226
Someone tried saying that XRP would never go to $1 because of the market cap lol. It went to $3. Market cap shills btfo

>>10232363

Please videotape yourself when you do it, the rest of us want to watch the real link “singularity”

>>10232441
I literally just told you I would have no reason to, are you dense? Fuck off.

also

>us

Disgusting.

>>10231756


based Joyceposter

>>10232137
lul

>>10232380
It’s called mining you dipshit.

>>10232663

You’re going to do it, no doubt about it

>>10232895
You're both projecting and trying way too hard

>>10232737
Wrong
>>10232380
Wrong

It’s all distributed. They made money out of thin air, and companies like swift, sap and salesforce are all in on it. They are creating an artificial demand. It’s like if a large majority of companies all agree to use a certain shipping company because it’s X reason. And now most companies won’t deal with your business unless you use the certain shipping company. But the shipping company is created / owned by the vast majority of these large companies. And the only way to use this shipping company is to accept whatever price the shipping company is charging. Since this shipping company is special / unique you can’t relate the price to other shipping companies.

TLDR; if chainlink is an insider job. What their doing ha sleep never been done before (creating a product / currency ) which might be considered illegal/unethical. But who gives a fuck. It’s going to save companies a ton of money while making the ones first adopting the network a huge amount of equity in chainlink . We will see how it plays out in the end

>>10233009
Has never*

>>10232963

You bought a meme, how hard is that to
Comprehend kek fucking brainlet

gay

>>10231967
c'mon dude. lol.

>>10233009
how do you stake link? There is a wallet?

>>10232963

You bought a meme, how hard is that to
Comprehend kek fucking brainlet

>>10231724
I don't think you understand how complex this project is.

>>10233071
It’s staking but people pay you. No extra link is generated.

>>10233029
>>10233072
You bought a meme, how hard is that to
Comprehend kek fucking brainlet

Buy LINK

I'm just gonna post this once.

Sergey is mildly autistic and an idealist.
Those kind of people value more innovation and helping the human race than any material wealth.
This makes them unfit to value money or physical stuff in a world where material wealth is worth more than spiritual wealth.
Vitalik is the most obvious exponent of this kind, not realizing the true dollar value of his own project. Ethereal means intangible, soul, not substance. Not bitCOIN. Not BCASH, not liteCOIN.
Sergey believes the IOT needs Chainlink or some project that solves the Oracle problem to become a real thing.
He isn't doing it for the money, he believes that the IOT will give the average Joe a fighting chance against big financial institutions. Just listen to his presentations, the emphasis isn't in giving big institutions more power but make a decentralized system where anyone can contribute even those that don't have Links.
The selling point to the corporate big shots it's that they will get a sizeable chunk of the network from the get go.
Meanwhile retail investors have to buy Link from exchanges or aquire links by managing a node. But the catch is Chainlink needs to be Decentralized so any company can run a node but they can't control if some random anon wants to take a piece of the pie as long as he has valuable accurate data.
So Sergey made the Ico. Against swift or whoever might be interested in the network. Not to raise money, to distribute the tokens before the big boys hoard them. As soon as the ico ended, radio silence , no hype, nothing. A dev that not only doesn't want to raise the price of their own token but is actually pissed binance listed it. When did that happen in crypto?
Mark my words, as soon as the big boys get their tokens they will have all the incentive to skyrocket the price. They won't dump, they already have money, what they want is control. Absolute control over a sizeable chunk of the first IOT network

>>10231756
fmao

>>10233601
>but is actually pissed binance listed it.
I agree with most of what you said but there are screenshots of someone from binance asking for contact with the team in ChainLink slack

>>10233601
What proof do you have that chainlink was upset binance listed their token?

chainlink got listed back when bittrex and bitfenix was the top exchanges and binance was barely even top 20, they listed fucking everything to get enough volume

but you fucking newfags wouldn't know

>>10231127

>>10233655
The thing is it was the exchange that came to the team and not the other way around.
Imagine what would have happened if it leaked out that Binance wanted to list Chainlink and the Devs refused. In my heart of hearts I'm convinced Sergey actually asked them to Delist Chainlink to avoid the SEC and the chinks just laughed at him because they will never turn off those profit bots

>>10233500
>checking those comfy dubs

>>10231127
Linnnnk talks alot about Swift but that bitch never mentions Linnnnk. 8 cents in 2020.

>>10231767
a big fucking if.
but if became the standard protocol for swift payments in the derivative market as well as the standard protocol for all dtl's data fetching, that could be a reality.
its probable? nah.

>>10233698
nah, Sergey cannot prevent anyone from listing his token especially since it's and erc token.
Back in the day everyone wanted LINK to be listed on bittrex and there were rumors that people from bittrex were interested in listing LINK but they needed someone from the team to come with the initiative, Rory hinted that they won't do that but are open to LINK being listed if exchanges decide to do it on their own

>>10233688
KEK

>>10233742

because LINK will most likeyl rebrand to something like "Smart Oracle" or similar to better reflecti its nature when the time is right. smartcontract.com is the main hub for what the industry knows as chainlink. LINK is just some placeholder designed to be as boring and uncreative as possible

>>10233744
You just proved my point. During the Ico craze they just said " well, if they want to list Link come talk to us" when shitcoins everywhere were paying obscene amounts of cash to get listed and some even paid a fee to not be delisted.

>>10232380

>Wait... If node operators are paid in link, are those links being created out of thin air?

no, they'll be paid from the 650 million tokens not in circulation. these can go a really long way because each token has 18 digits. this is one of the reasons why each token will be worth so much, if they're each worth a ton then we don't have to worry about the supply running out. if each token is worth, say, $1000 then i can a node operator .001 link ($1) for a job and we don't have to worry about running out of tokens any time soon.

>>10233742
Sergey literally said they are partnered with Swift during one of his presentations. He would be deep in lawsuits if it was not the case.
DYOR.
Old news
>priced in

>>10233837
yea but you said that they listed LINK against Sergey's will, and I don't think it's truth, also binance was no big deal back then trying to list everything, I don't know if anyone paid for listings/to prevent delisting on binance back then

>>10231377
Checked. Whatever, I hold 100k in Chainlink Cash (LINKCH) as insurance.

>>10231127
>x5100 in 5 months is FUD

come on man, we all know CL is amazing and it might make sick gains in the coming years but don't be ridiculous

>>10233883
I mean, even if LINK does a x100 in sats, BTC stills needs to go on a x51 (30k per BTC)

it could happen only during a run like last year's and it's not gonna happen this soon

we accumulate now

>>10233873
There was a convo or a presentation when Sergey was told Link was listed on binance or someone was asking if they were actively seeking new exchanges and you could feel he was totally not happy about it

>>10233918
LINK please

>>10233918
maybe, when some autists started asking about the tokens during the bitcoin superconference presentation he tried to cut the topic as quickly as possible, but I doubt he would want the tokens to be only available on etherdelta since september last year or whenever the ico was

Is anyone else here mostly just in it for the tech? This shit is world-changing.

>>10233940
Don't have it. Perhaps some anon saved them

>>10233954
o/
I mean, I want to make money, but I want to make money with something I support ethically

>>10233954
I'm only in it for the (potentially useful) tech. Bought at 0.44 in last August, never selling

>>10231127
do i have to stake the linkies now or can i stake them 2020 to recive the rewards

so and will i get the reward in Stinkies or in money?

>>10233984
You'll get paid in stinkies, regardless of the year. Staking won't be available until mainnet. You could start staking at mainnet release and let your stack build until 2020. You'll be able to get more returns then, since you have more let your linkies build and the price will rise

>>10231226
>muh market cap

He doesn't know the that market cap is just price multiplied by supply.
He doesn't know that it's only used because crypto is often compared to stocks since it's similar.
He doesn't understand that one day market cap might be obsolete when it comes to measuring the value of a crypto asset.

I'm never selling

>>10233688
Checked. A spicy new iteration, anon.

>>10231707
While it will help with adoption, the public ledgers still need increased scalability.
This is why companies are building on pernissioned solutions.
Once the public ones scale (if they do), the use cases will fly all over.

This is aiming to be resolved by 2020.

>>10233979
>Bought at 0.44 in last August

What's up with link for real? This other anon earlier today was talking about how all these other projects need link. What if ChainLink can't solve the oracle problem are there any other projects attempting it in a decentralized way? Also if this problem is such a major bottleneck to blockchain and smartcontracts being able to mimic real world adoption why does it seem only 1 project is currently working on it but nobody talks about it?

>>10235185

Cryptos dirty little secret bro. DYOR.
The reason we believe in link is not because we want ot to moon, but because it has to moon if any other projects are to one day deliver.

>>10235185
you again
>>10235207
you again

>>10235185
I meant mimic real world agreements. I saw this on /pol/ a while back and I can't get any info on link besides whitepaper/medium posts maybe some YouTube videos. It's like everyone here talks about link but nobody is saying anything.

>>10233698
>they will never turn off those profit bots
>tfw its a plot between sergey and cz
>wash trade the price down until all the weak hands are shaken out
>release mainnet at $0.01
>singularity as it has been told

>>10235274

Just fuck off. You had long enough to accumulate.

>>10235185
I bust a move as smooth as Casanova
And count another quick mill'
I'm getting paid for my trade, but I'm still real
And if you look between the lines you'll find a rhyme
As strong as a fuckin' nine

>>10235299
Oh wow, so /biz/tards actually shit up /pol/ as well. I thought it was a one way street.