[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]

/biz/ - Business & Finance


View post   

File: 13 KB, 300x168, Unknown.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10201074 No.10201074 [Reply] [Original]

I'm about to drop $10,000,000 USD in either BCH or BTC. I'll post proof of purchase once I'm convinced of either coin. Now go.

>> No.10201083
File: 36 KB, 500x375, do it faggot window.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10201083

BCH u faget

>> No.10201108

>>10201074

DYOR faggot. Either that or fuck off.

>> No.10201112

>>10201074
bitcoin cash has taken a huge dive, not worth it

get some ETH

BTC fluctuates by 1-2% at a time. ETH and BCC make gains in the 5-7% range

>> No.10201113
File: 83 KB, 768x593, bc46306cd79baf9c01ae84b35265cbc3.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10201113

Me doubt anyone with 10 mil lacks cognitive ability of see BCH scamcoin

>> No.10201117

>>10201074
buy same amount of BCH as you buy BTC (not $ value, but face value, so if you buy 1000 BTC, also buy 1000 BCH) AT MOST. only go lower than that not higher. but do buy a little because noone knows what happens in the crypto space. but BTC is by far the most stable coin and will almost certainly remain so.

>> No.10201122

I'm going to drop $100,000,000 USD into either BCH or BTC the opposite of whatever OP picks.

>> No.10201127

>>10201112
> bitcoin cash has taken a huge dive, not worth it

well, if it's already taken a huge dump, that means BCH is probably a buy

>> No.10201154

>>10201113
Not an argument. Try harder.

>> No.10201169
File: 7 KB, 250x229, 1515021470444.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10201169

>>10201074
50% BTC
20% ETH
20% LTC
0% BCASH LOL
10% XMR

This is a safe bet all around if you're looking to not make too risky of a long term investment.

>> No.10201186

>>10201074
BCH of course. The lightning network is provably unworkable and segwit is just a massive kludge that overcomplicates the entire system.

>> No.10201194
File: 490 KB, 800x945, 96734b2dc4ad4d71ddac86af32b2b1ee.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10201194

>>10201154
Whose tryin to argument? Kek

>> No.10201201

>>10201074
I mean it depends, do you want to invest in peer-to-peer electronic cash (BCH), or a spoke-to-hub electronic tabs (Lightning Network, BTC people don't talk about scaling Bitcoin anymore so they have to hype up LN instead).

>> No.10201222

>>10201201
Good point. Corewhores don't care about scaling onchain anymore, which is unsettling

>> No.10201295

>>10201222
Bitchcashers are annoying, and just accuse you of supporting "their enemy" as if nothing else exists in this space. DYOR because onchain scaling is a huge problem that no one has solved. If Bitchcash is so great just get major retailers to accept it where they cannot accept bitcoin, and I will shut up. (IT is literally that easy) Right now no major business really accepts either so I might as well be patient and see what devs come up with or sell my stack in 5 years. When I can live with a decentralized token to pay for my shit that is what will win in my heart. Lets face it since BCH was added on coinbase it has been nothing but a pump n dump. Onchain scaling didnt work for the internet and it will not work for crypto.

>> No.10201362

I'm going to market buy $1,000,000,000 of bitconnect then dump it 15 minutes later starting tomorrow at 9:00 am.

>> No.10201480

>>10201074
At this stage in development Store of value is the property that means the most. https://athcoinindex.com/ kind of shows where everything stands in that regard.

>> No.10201512

>>10201113
I bet you're the kind of idiot who sold their BCH as soon as they could after the fork.

>> No.10201646

>>10201295
>>10201480
You're retarded. Bitcoin saw negative adoption because major retailers couldn't reasonably accept it anymore because "lol we must keep the blocksize at 1MB."

> Onchain scaling didnt work for the internet and it will not work for crypto.
This is one of the dumbest things I have ever heard. Onchain scaling of the internet didn't work? Do you even know what you're trying to say?