/biz/ - Business & Finance

What's the bottom?

>>10014859
If you want to play roulette, buy at $0.03. The bottom is $0.01-$0.03. This will happen early July. I have called every price movement since $0.60, listen if you want to save any pennies you have in this

You're right but that doesn't persuade me to sell. I'm still waiting for $0.03

Thank you based Amex anon. Unironically sold because it's obvious af that this is going the way of the other biz darling, Req.

Sigh. Another genius who "calls" that the market will continue in the direction it's been going.
Within a month you'll be gone like all the others.

>>10014900
You don't want $0.03 to be the bottom? Mmm

>>10014891
So you would rather sell at $0.03 than $0.17? You don't think it's getting back to $1 do you? It's over, most of these altcoins will never get back any value relative to 2017

>>10014890
i can buy so many linkies at $.03 *_*

If link is 3 cents then btc will be like 1-2k.

>>10014926
Not selling sweetie pie

>>10014952
It's possible this happens to BTC short term. Long term, most alts are cooked

>>10014958
Your loss. You're probably the same person that ignored me at $0.60. So you are prepared to lose 95% of your money for pride

>>10014848
hell mr. good samaritan who has now bad intentions

>>10015060
it's ok anon I have a job and I'm buying more. I expected these kind of movements when I bought in. 5 years of this drama minimum.

I hope we bottom at .03, will buy a quarter million stinkers at that price. Sold some off in the 80c range to wait the downtrend out.

Folks it's not about buying at 3 cents, it's about what you expect to get. Sure, 3 to 6 cents is a double, but there's a chance that doesn't happen. Is it worth the risk? The goal here is making lots of money. I didn't buy into ETH without doing dd on growth opportunities. LINK has poor fundamentals because of Sergey. I CANNOT stress enough how poor of a leader he is.

He is currently hiding out and some top 50 wallet holders are asking for his head. He is a very very rich man for basically some pretty charts on a webpage. Imagine getting millions for that and no product (it will be canned before completion)

>Muh SWIFT and bank partnerships

>>10015060
I'm buying more. Yihaaaaa gonna ride this ho to zero (0)!!!.

>>10014848
what's your best BUY right now?

>>10014900
100% agree, the entire market is down a result of BTC and this douche goes after Link like it is a failure. Can not stand this jerk off or any of the other morons fudding like he does.

>>10015302
Why do they still work on the project if it is done for, why are the devs adding commits to github everydat? why bother?

>>10014848
>selling?
My linkies stay stinky

>>10015060
>>10015060
Hell, I have a good paying day job so I don't have to rely on trading to get by. The fundamentals of chainlink are still sound at this point so it's much easier to just hold instead of trading/timing the market.
I can afford to lose my investment in link.

>>10014848
1. We will never sell
2. The bottom is nowhere near $0.03. That would mean 10,000 LINK for $300, and people would buy a fucking ton. That scenario is still a win in my book because I’d be able to double my stack
3. You’re a faggot, and you’re not going to make it

>>10015302
Show us where the top 50 wallet holders are calling for his head. Show screenshots, show twitter links.
Whats that? You cant because reasons?

>>10015565
BTC, remember the goal is to acquire as many as possible. This is not going away, as much as some want it to. As I said last time, ETC before it gets listed on CB, it will appear extremely cheap to the broadest base of investors

>>10015628
No, it's because I know the team, industry titans, and what is taking place behind the scenes. Dimitri is starting to doubt everything about this, and Thomas is not enough. They need 10-20 elite programmers for this but would rather "milk" the story. It's not working, which is why you see rory begging people on Slack for possible companies that need this solution (they wouldn't need this if they had SWIFT+Banks)

>>10015637
They need to appear to be doing something or risk lawsuits for the thievery of an ico

>>10014848
>Let's try again. Have you sold yet?

nope will be buying as long as it is under 25, believe in the project and good github progress

>>10014848
>he he luckily for me the overall bear continues so I can pretend like I predicted this

just fuck off you attention whore.
I don't even hold link but I would plow my fist through your stupid face if I had the chance like I always do with smug faggots like you

>>10015930

So this is the price "singularity" you people talked about. OK

based retarded link bagholders

>>10015755
or.. it could be you are just a giant asshole, and I do not believe you know any of the people on the project, none of them. Do us all a favor, quit doing us favors and posting your lame ass'd noise. At the end of the day, the only thing I believe is you suck and are an attention whore.

>>10015755
> which is why you see rory begging people on Slack for possible companies that need this solution (they wouldn't need this if they had SWIFT+Banks)

Got any proof of this? I've only ever seen him politely agree to reach out to other crypto projects that people from the community have suggested to him.

>>10015930
>suicidal bagholder detected

>>10015970
lol that's me!! xD :)

>>10016098
I’d be happy to post his begs

>>10016410
Go ahead then

>>10015060
Job fag here
>the price will go down
>Look guys i told you
you are just a plain old faggot.

im never selling and buying more you just wait.

>>10016617
Digging now for OP, I am also on slack

>>10017579
bump for future embarassment

Rory is quite cringy and is there literally so Sergey isn't harassed by bagholders. He probably knows nothing other than the few breadcrumbs Sergey throws him every once in a while. Virtually all of the new information (new hires, coding developments, etc.) is discovered by people outside of any official channels. I have no doubt he pops into other slack channels and talks about chainlink, and it says nothing about the health of the project.

This guy is a larper faggot. Please stop responding to him.

>>10017579
Lol what a surprise. Its fucking nothing.

>>10015755
I guess docusign and salesforce expressing interest in chainlink was a fluke.

>350 million circulating supply out of 1billion, 650 million tokens held by devs
>650 million

it's gonna get inflated so fucking hard. Assuming there are 5k nodes with average of 20k links in each node, that's only 100million links staked.

This anon is guaranteed wanting to increase his stack hahahaha

He will deny but it's the truth

>>10014848
>Trying to convince me to sell $200 worth of suicide insurance.

Why do you even care? Are you a magnanimous angel or something more sinister?

>>10015755
I’m a top 50 Link holder and you’re full of shit. I’m also in the slack too and there is no begging...

> muh industry titan friends
> muh insider info

Shut the fuck up you larping faggot

>>10016617
Tick-tock

Who the fuck is this muppet?

>>10018155
astrofag wannabe. proven larp already

>>10014848
made up bollocks.

I laugh whenever I see this card appear - amateur hour in biz

FAGGOT FAGGOT FAGGOT FAGGOT FAGGOT FAGGOT FAGGOT FAGGOT FAGGOT FAGGOT FAGGOT FAGGOT FAGGOT FAGGOT FAGGOT FAGGOT FAGGOT FAGGOT FAGGOT FAGGOT FAGGOT FAGGOT FAGGOT FAGGOT FAGGOT FAGGOT FAGGOT FAGGOT FAGGOT FAGGOT FAGGOT FAGGOT FAGGOT FAGGOT FAGGOT FAGGOT FAGGOT FAGGOT FAGGOT FAGGOT FAGGOT FAGGOT FAGGOT FAGGOT FAGGOT FAGGOT FAGGOT FAGGOT FAGGOT FAGGOT

LARP LARP LARP LARP LARP LARP LARP LARPLARP LARP LARP LARPLARP LARP LARP LARPLARP LARP LARP LARPLARP LARP LARP LARPLARP LARP LARP LARPLARP LARP LARP LARPLARP LARP LARP LARPLARP LARP LARP LARPLARP LARP LARP LARPLARP LARP LARP LARPLARP LARP LARP LARPLARP LARP LARP LARP

>>10015628
LINK was falling for much longer than the market has.

Because it, like you, is a piece of shit.