/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>29932955
>comparing SaaS versus non-software companies
>considering revenue when Tesla is a thing
boomer anon.. I..

>>28326631
statistically false idiot

any IPOE bros? is today a good buy day? i need some financial sector exposure

>>27432330
you fapped to her retard

>>27432223
you always want a SPAC near NAV unless you truly believe in the management team (BTWN SPAC is led by Thiel, etc), there are times where deals don't go through/are delayed or any other random event can happen that causes a reversion to the ~NAV. The premium you're paying above 10 is purely speculative, and SPACs usually (I'd say around 50% of the time) drop on merger from peeps looking to make a quick buck off of the hype. Take a look at GHIV > UWMC as another example.. ramp up into 14-15 pre-merger, financials look fine, #2 mortgage company, drops to 8 on merger instead of pumping like expected and is now crabbing at 10

>>27393260
nah, RH is protected on all fronts and someone would buy them out if they really were down bad. i would, however, do what i do and get a legacy broker like Fidelity and just keep half my portfolio (usually longterm holds) there

>>27187067
sorry, correction. it pumped from '97-'99, hit around 90 and then plummeted to 7 in 2001. how do you even know a company is worth holding when something lie this happens

>>26855835
yes, of course. PLTR is the anime girl stock of the future

>>26740415
Memes aside, and I say this as someone who bought in @10 and then sold @33 only to re-buy mid-20s, it's the next Tesla/Apple-tier company. Just check their demo day stream and ask yourself if that isn't software of the future.

>>26592570
PLTR!

>>26215603
moon

>>25674195
whenever i post my strategy i get shit on

what the fuck is happening tomorrow bros