/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>8997359

>>8963806
jk link literally going to 1000 eoy

>>8719877
Ehhhh....

>>8628962
>>8628969
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KTf5j9LDObk

>>8021843
I think everybody here is slightly more autistic as a result of reading your post.

So what kinda bags you holding anon?

you guys are all invested in crypto and fucking talking yourselves out of it.

>>7948640

>places 2L of diet pepsi onto homemade alter of Mercury in his living room.

"Good. we're safe for another day."

Either their tech is so trivial that it will be fast to port it to Golang, or their tech is so complicated it will take years to rewrite.

In the first scenario, there is no reason why SWIFT or another competitor cannot just clone the tech and sell their own implimentation faster by rewriting it with a team of skilled developers.

In the second scenario, it will take way too long and software rewrites are INCREDIBLY risky. They very very rarely finish on time and on budget, even with skilled devs. There are always a million tiny problems and bugs that have to be continuously patched.

I have seen enough rewrites go to hell and never get delivered in my career as a dev, even on very skilled teams.

I didn't know they needed to rewrite the whole thing. Also they picked a meme language. Should have picked C++ or C. Many more skilled developers to choose from.

I'm out.