/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>57166333
>act like a douchebag to other pro-pmg anons
>get butthurt when they bite back
Redditor-tier behavior.

>buy my bags
If your project was so good why do you need more exit liquidity? Seriously, why...

>>56847867
>muh heckin mistypearinos!
>>>/lgbt/

>>56642659
>Le Fun
IQDELETE confirmed redditor hahahahahahahahaha! And I thought he couldn't be any more of a looser.

>you just can't buy silver, ok?!

>>56067101
>>56067108
>look see! See what is says! You have to use the phrase like it says here!

>>56052130
>reddit
Why would anyone here go there unless you're a genuine søyboy? Seriously, why?

>>56011607
>I'm cucked faggot with little faggots. This place is full of immature, pervy little boys like you. I suppose that's ok, but i prefer talking to adult men.
Enjoy your wet dream and don't forget to finish your cocoa

>>55536099
>reddit spacing
HAHAHAHAHA!

>>54360169
>It's ridiculous how much cuckservatives are shilling being a tradie, but electricians are probably the least labour intensive out of all the trades.

>>54360427
>>insist that rents are reasonable compensation for the value that they provide the tenants
>>unable to see that property taxes are reasonable compensation for the value that the state provides its homeowners
>why are they like this?

>>54260498
>ELI5: What Would Happen if the Fed Just Stopped the MOASS? Anonymous (ID: IUt8NR9i) 03/22/23(Wed)11:11:50 No.54260498▶>>54260592 >>54260636
> Hey I've heard about the apes for a long time and I have normie level understanding of the stock market, but my understanding is that there's a bunch of naked shorts on GME and some others and motivated retail investors who just won't sell, so eventually the hedge fund and potentially the whole brokeridge firm will have to be liquidated to pay the holders of GME.
> My question is what would happen if the fed just said "this is too dangerous for the financial system, so we are going to make you take 200 a share, or 1,000 even?
> Is there any technical effect of them doing that or anything other than mad people preventing them from just doing that?

>>51350546
>snipes fact check: partially true
>contrary to popular belief, a mechanism that eliminates a percentage of the total supply of an asset does *NOT* constitute for “deflationary.” Read more here: