/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>53084105
>i'm still not sure why you took it personally.
In my very first post addressing this in this thread I explained why, you could have easily cleared it up at that point, but instead
>my vague answers were merely trying to express
you chose to be intentionally vague in order to convey some sort of message.

>the literal title of the previous thread seemed to be attacking me, so i just responded to it.
The title of the previous thread was "Coinmetrooo" with comment "Winner Edition".

This is becoming tiresome so I'm going to call it quits.
Happy moo year y'all.