/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>18955501

>>18835491
Why not? Are you afraid? KeK
> muuuh roger ver is good
> Mmmuuuhh is no more a pornstar that slit that stores the funds of link
> muuh vitalik is not autistic
> muuuhh bitcore is egold

fuck off twat

>>18761503
It’s obvious

>>15912391
why lump race and gender like that?

there's no reason why someone can't believe one is a cause but not the other

>>13617472
he is talking about the latest release of truecrypt, which probably is compromised. 7.1a is still secure.

TrueCrypt Setup 7.1a.exe
E95ECA399DFE95500C4DE569EFC4CC77B75E2B66A864D467DF37733EC06A0FF2

unfortunately it doesn't play way with UEFI motherboards or non MBR disks so it isn't as reliable for system/whole disk encryption these days. luckily VeraCrypt seems like a fine continuation of TrueCrypt.

VeraCrypt Setup 1.23-Hotfix-2.exe
D55C26807A591643DD4C21AC0FFAAA733AAFA52307D36ED9A95ED0A5EF35E4FE

if trust isn't placed in VeraCrypt at least TrueCrypt 7.1a can still be used for encrypted file containers on modern hardware

Notice that the author is Jonald Fyookball, a very big name in the BCH space. Roger Ver is often talking about Fyookball.

>>12879741
why BSV is bitcoin: it doesn't have segwit (BTC), hasn't changed the tx ordering of the blocks or introduced centralized checkpoints (BCH), hasn't changed the block time (LTC).

BSV intends to restore the 2016 difficult adjustment ( https://twitter.com/ProfFaustus/status/1061991109914738688 ) and they try to reimplement the removed opcodes.

BSV is literally the original bitcoin. it doesn't matter if craig is satoshi or not, he is still a genius.

BTC have more reasons why they aren't bitcoin btw, they have clearly lost their way by moving from wanting to be cash for the whole world to wanting to be a store of value for only those who can afford it. they try to build sidechains that isn't even BTC exclusive instead of just scaling BTC on-chain as satoshi wanted ("it never really hits a scale ceiling"). and now there's talk of lowering the block size from 1 MB to 300 kB, it's ridiculous.

>>12876905
anyone really surprised?
this could delay the USD crash by another 10 years

>>12814299
if you paid just to get no ads + a "i support 4chan"-icon or something else that truly is trivial then i wouldn't have a problem with it

but instead it was "ok we need captcha to deal with spam, let's adopt the laziest possible solution and require it on every single fucking post, hey btw pay us money and you don't need to solve captcha". then they started restricting how often you could post with long cooldowns, unless of course you pay for a gold account. that's why i call it extortion. there's a reason nobody bothers to image dump nowadays.

>>12586996
>We have a fucking working SNES Emulator on the blockchain.
do you have a direct link?

>>12566036
well then the 500k prediction still stands, i doubt it will be even 1% of that amount

Check out 15:42 and 18:12 in this video:

https://youtu.be/03lM4BnD6Tk?t=942

>>12459782
Doesn't look like it, sir.

Good news, we can learn more about nChain's technical director:
https://youtu.be/WDuvYp77tJU