/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>52695780
ideas aren't black and white. someone replying to arguments doesn't mean they necessarily believes other party is wrong. even then, all perspectives make sense at some level. i never said PoW, coinmetro or kadena were somehow bad projects or systems. i only called people "fools" because i thought it were funny and light-hearted, and it was solely related to their behaviors. i didn't realize it was annoying, i'm sorry. i took all the baits myself and should've been more mature. (definitely not fun, people like QD/eiH/2 have been carefully picking words to hurt me as much as possible, such as constantly calling me a bully with disregard to all the time and efforts oriented into sensible contributions. it's scary)
there is not much else to discuss during a bear market, such drama was definitely insignificant. i won't ever post on 4ch*n or do anything related to crypto ever again. i wish all of you true happiness. good bye.
>>52695884
pow may or may not be perfect. multiple layers of proposition should be evaluated
- is pow really censorship-resistant: assumption people have is, corruption and censorship won't happen in pow because of the competitive mining equilibrium, but without external deliberative regulations, blockchains (pow or pos) are inherently monopolistic. self-referential positions always provide exponential advantages in all purely algorithmic systems. (imo vitalik proves himself wise in this thread https://twitter.com/VitalikButerin/status/1598019289784938496 ). even if mev censorship were somehow prevented with zk obfuscation, we should expect bias at all layers. pow is not the sole solution to our collective inability to find truth, merely another step toward it.
- are power and truth correlated: financial systems are tools to reward intelligence and creativity, but it's impossible to assert whether or not a given system is optimal, because its own definition of intelligence is necessarily self-referential
>>52696204
crab mentality