[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]

/biz/ - Business & Finance

Search:


View post   

>> No.14603644 [View]
File: 121 KB, 981x819, plebs.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14603644

Do you guys see what I'm dealing with here?
Can someone please help me out?

I can't tell if I'm being trolled or if the guy is this clueless.

>>14603383
More or less, this. Women can now choose if and when they become pregnant.

Also, they have much more control over their periods. It's not medically advised, but they were able to delay/skip their period by skipping the placebo phase of their birth control.

Women gained the ability to choose if/when they have periods and if/when they get pregnant.

>>14603390
>>14603404
>you specifically said in your earlier post that it was hormones that caused women to join the workforce
link me to where I said that, and you'll see that you are the one changing my argument

>you have no way to prove your original claim
>You have no way to prove that a multifactorial societal change that took place under the incredible technological changes of the past 60 years is due to one factor more than another
Oh gee, you think? You think I wasn't able to prove it unequivocally?

Dummy, we landed on the moon in that period, it's impossible to "prove" something like this. All I said was the role of hormones needs to be looked at, and hormonal birth control could just as easily be responsible for the shift in women in the workforce:
>>14588511
>People always attribute massive changes to social movements, when hormones need to be looked at. For example, those who claim feminism was responsible for women in the work force, when it could easily be attributed to the advent of hormonal birth control.

>>14603550
IPO market is one of the big market concerns right now. The RealReal IPO went unnoticed here, but that actually was under the CEO who IPO'd pets.com

>> No.14384436 [View]
File: 121 KB, 981x819, plebs.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14384436

>>14371833
>editing and cherry picking
>removing arguments that make him look bad

Please go outside and talk to humans

When they act disgusted with you, it's not the end of the world, it's an opportunity to learn what you're doing wrong.

And stop watching so much porn

>> No.14149074 [View]
File: 121 KB, 981x819, plebs.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14149074

CNBC calling this "another hot IPO" when almost everyone who bought, except for those who got in before it opened, lost money.

Opened at 36.00, ran up to $41.34, fell to ~$35 right now.

I should be so fucking angry. But... I'm just not very surprised. I got LYFTed for 30 shares.

>>14147636
Reminder that these 4 letter "personality" profiles are an absolute meme with no scientific basis that have been proven to be unreliable.

A housewife and her mother-in-law came up with it, and used an idea of Jung's to shill it to the masses.

There is a "personality" typing that has scientific basis. It's called the Big 5, or OCEAN.

You plebs need to stop wasting your time on pseudoscience pop-psychology. This is "I read this article on Buzzfeed" tier.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]