/biz/ - Business & Finance

To BSVers: is there anything that could make you disbelieve that CSW is Satoshi? I suspect there's nothing for most of you left in the BSV camp, other than something totally nebulous and subjective like "if he stops demonstrating PoW" or "if he stops realising Satoshi's Vision with BSV"

Specifically I'm looking for a verifiable condition where, should it happen, you'll finally lose faith in the Fraud.

For instance, he's promised that his lawsuit against Peter McCormack will prove he's Satoshi. If he loses to McCormack is that it? Will you guys recant your position? Cryptorebel has suggested that maybe when he loses to Kleiman he will be forced to liquidate his Satoshi Bitcoins to pay up. If this happens and the coins still don't move, is that it? Even if he makes some lame excuse or tells a tall tale about how he plans to sell these coins without actually moving them on the blockchain?

When this is all over, there will only be one ticker, and it will be BC. Just as Satoshi intended

>>7650818
>bitcoin
>logo is a coin
>anonymous weeb founder LARPs as a Jap

who would invest in this shit?