/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>19929254
>Only 3%
>Complaining about 2%
>Thinking 1% is a dump
>-1% is still not a real dump
>AAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHH
>>19929262
Hard to swallow pills really

>>19560776
>down for the week, due to overreaction on positive jobs report.
You mean last week? The "analysts" are bullish on the report.
>Positive for the next 2-3 months
Any forecast has the same value as flipping two coins right now.
>Because the FED and Trump intervened so early makes me comfy anon
Monetary and Fiscal policy having to take such quick and drastic measures should make you very uncomfortable if you're looking at equities through more traditional lenses like (forward) P/E, PEG, book value, etc. We might be entering a new paradigm, but how are we supposed to price an equity? Do we need to estimate total assets + available credit? Do we need to integrate projected total profits as a function of debt load with a solvency limit? Investing in a system that uses this kind of estimate is madness. We might make money in stocks, but I don't like it at all.

>>19561497
it's not record, i should clarify. It's been discussed before at length that we are currently deflationary as supply expansion does not necessarily mean inflation (in the very near term) because there is not enough money in circulation and dollars are (not sure about last two open days) still being hoarded. We don't know the rammifications of M3 expansion, as we haven't seen it play out from 2008. The FED is fighting a deflationary spiral because there aren't enough dollars circulating. If you're the anon in that discussion with the article where
>PQ=MV
>V proportional to Q by definition of transactions
>thf increasing M increases P because V -> Q
It's stupid to not realize that M can increase but V can decrease proportionally so much that P can still decrease. M2 is going to be very interesting over the next calendar year.