/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>28679033
>"yeah i suck dick when i want to—i do whatever I want"
This mentality leaves you no different than a fag.
Rules create meaning, anon. Don't let your stomach or desires become your god. It's a slippery slope. You have a long road to maturity if you think doing whatever you want makes you special or is an admirable quality. Especially on here.
Some norms are established for a reason.
I hope you see the errors of your ways before that mentality leads you to blind ruin. It's only for your own benefit.

>>26356712
Exactly. And thanks. I didn't realize the importance of the expanding industries surrounding the real technology. And I really didn't know the practical utility of blockchain.
Hope others learn from this too.
Most important thing to take away for anyone lurking is that I should've realize that it was still very early in the industry surrounding crypto currency (still is). Which means it would've been better to just acquire them as they were intended and take researching projects more seriously to get in at the ground floor of future big projects.

>>21597408
newfag

>>10375131
All anons should pay attention to this. High IQ.
I have an aunt and she bought a brand new house built in a bad area of Riverside county, California. This is her fourth house she bought in that area (she has kept one of them for a rental). The problem is that every time she buys a brand new house, she loses value immediately. And her equity never is returned to the full value she initially bought the house at.
You can look at it like this.
>She pays 659,000 USD for a new house, the value in a year is 550,000 USD.
>In one year of """owning""" her own house, she lost 109,000 USD. On one of her past houses , she bought it just before the financial collapse and it was even worse.
>Alternatively, she could've rented a house in Riverside of a similar size for 2,500 USD a month, spent 500,000 to buy a smaller house within a nice area of Los Angeles like Redondo Beach or Torrance, collected rent from it, and over the course of several year her investment would appreciate in value.

I hope everyone here sees the logic behind this. She has lost hundreds of thousands of dollars over the course of twenty five years because she wanted to own a big house and only could afford them in bad areas. So in certain cases, yes it's better to rent if you can reason that the value of the asset wont appreciate overtime.