/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>13119819

There's a couple more on the table. There's a lot of behind the scene's going on here on the bizdev side. There's going to be a lot of big announcements in 2019.

And as far as the browser war is concerned Brave could stop innovating today and they'd still be better than FF and Chrome when it comes to privacy. Plus the functionality is on parity with those two as well. The more people learn about how bad Google abused them the more they're going to flee from any product they have. And that's just legit boomers. I'm getting a lot of my peers to make the switch already.

> muh Metcalfe's law

>>11786432

Another thing that's interesting is that they're dropping some serious names anytime they use an example or hypothetical situation. Now with the kind of company Brave is, this has got to be extremely calculated. Not only because it could be a breach of public trust if they imply all these partnerships exist when in reality there is nothing, and the fact that these companies could easily rebuff the claims, which would be an very bad look for the company as well. But I'm sure they're well aware of these facts, which can only mean they have some serious heavy hitters lined up. Here's a list real quick off the top of my head, feel free to jump in and append it:

- McDonalds
- Amazon
- Nike
- American Express
- BMW, with a teaser that the ad would be interactive in a way where you can rotate the car and open the doors, hood and trunk for BAT


Not to mention that they have stated that v1 with ads will rollout before the end of 2018. I'm about to throw another 1k into BAT, with I could do more but I'm gonna hold this bitch at least a year or two if everything seems to be humming along. Very exciting times ahead.

>>11596128
I'm gonna laugh the day we can post the $1 memes unironically. I wish I could see the face of the people who use them unironicallly.

>>11560291
This turns the snowball into the avalanche, not to mention the fact that once companies see the utility in the BAT model, they'll be eager to jump ship, as we've seen with Dow Jones Media Group. I'm not saying that they'll abandon regular ads, but they'll definitely be looking to add that to their toolbox. And not only for the tech but for the ability to say that they're partnered with a blockchain company (which they technically are) because its the new .com era and stocks like Kodak are pumping 300% on it.

From here the pump continues to feed itself. Until we level off (with the potential of a small pullback, which is natural) on a price around $20, which imho is conservative. If we're in a ripping bull-market it could be as high as $50 to $100 dollars. A euphoric price point is $400, much like Litecoin did when it got added. But I don't think the addition to coinbase would do that alone today.

I think $2 to $50 by EOY certainly isn't unreasonable, given everything doesn't take a shit. But I don't see it being added to CB until sometime in 2019 due to the reasons above. But then again I could be wrong on that particular point because if v1 has the integrated wallet where you can buy and sell BAT with you debit card then CB would likely be the facilitator for that due to the fact that uphold sucks cock and they know it.

In addition to those points you must also consider the social aspect of Brave. Literal boomers are starting to really comprehend what's being done with their info online, and in true boomer fashion they're pissed. Not to mention everyone else that's really starting to get fed up with facebook and googles shit. So the climate is primed for a privacy centered option to take a large chunk on that market share.

Long story shorts, BAT bro's have a bright future ahead of them.

>>11538351
Gotta go shields down because nigger gook moot runs scammy ads. Especially given that a new format rolled out a couple weeks (maybe a month) ago.

>>11513922
>>11513952

Very clear and concise points. This is pasta worthy. Well done gentleman.


A few more I can think of are:

Tor tabs are native on the Brave browser

Users will be able to buy BAT directly in the browser, so there's no need to make a wallet, remember passphrases and fuck around with addresses. Very user friendly.

Automatic ad and tracker blocking (especially appealing to legit boomers who hate big tech companies because of Fox News).

Can and will be utilized as the online version of venmo.
I know there's more I'm just too stoned to think of any

>degenerate 50k bagholder

>>11474889
On the BAT order books?

>>11457131
What's after $8?

>t.50k bagholder

>>11457355
Unironically poke around the subreddit. It will all make sense.

>>11435813
>stay mad fag

>>11425415

Thanks anon


>>11425565
Honestly dude I'm not sure, it will depend on a lot of factors. If the crypto market stays like it is currently then I'll most likely hold until the next bullrun, but part of that is also because I don't want to realize short term capital gains. But then if I do that I risk some black swan event crashing everything. But for now the US economy is good (according to the boomer DJIA) so unless that starts to take a shit, that's the plan. Also I'm watching 0x closely to get an idea of the kind of pump that will occur with BAT. Although I personally think that BAT will do much better than 0x because it has to potential to impact everyone connected to the internet.

So (knock on wood) I think $1 BAT is definitely guaranteed on a CB listing, or the next bullrun for that matter. If they time it right and roll out the ad ecosystem with Brave v1 (which should be fucking soon I hope) then I see a lot of people fomo'ing in and potentially pushing the price up to $5 - $7. Now the question is what will it level off at, and furthermore, where is the general market heading. If its sideways like it has been I'll probably take profits if its at or above $5. But if the market is in a general uptrend (or if its fucking ripping like last year) then I'll try to ride it as high as I can. If it hits $20 a token then I'm definitely selling though because that's an obscene amount of ROI and I don't want to be posting pink wojaks 6 months later because I got greedy. So that's the current plan.

>>11346583
How do you justify those numbers? Not being hostile, just curious.

They kinda need to get their fucking asses in gear though. A lot of stuff on the timeline has been pushed to the right by a quarter, and the stuff that they have come out with, while significant, has only been a splash in the pond. I.e., just enough to keep them relevant. Ripple for instance has a retarded amount of bagholders, and that's not as (potentially) revolutionary of BAT/Brave. Same with the IOTA cunts and faggot link niggers. So they still have a long way to go before they're really taken seriously. But they seem like a definite sleeper regardless of that. As hard as it is I try to keep a cautious optimism about my bags. But its definitely suffering symptoms of the sideways market, just like everything else. Plus, its always been interesting to me that there seem to be a hardcore segment of people who absolutely refuse to entertain the idea of the BAT/Brave ecosystem. Just purely diametrically opposed to it for no rational reason. But hey to each their own.

>t.50k BAT bagholder

Can we get a BAT thread going brah's? I need positive reinforcement for my 50k bags. If the stinky linkies can jerk themselves off everyday why can't we?

>>11210241
>Literally the inverse of all this shit

>>11199011
Got a new screen shot for you brudda

>nice dubs