/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>5143871
>>5144090
Wew lad. I'll do my best.
1) It's more of the same, but more abstract.
The exchange of fiat is the preeminent determinant in the marketplace for cryptocurrency. You might not notice it because the ebb and flow is along a more predictable, long-form curve than crypto markets, but it's there.
This wouldn't be a problem save for the issue that fiat currency has no inherent value.
2) Blockchain infrastructure is susceptible to widespread infiltration.
Pretty self-explanatory. If you've been around long enough to remember when mining BTC was a reasonable alternative to buying coins, you know what I'm talking about.
3) Bureaucratic containment initiatives.
Remember this ugly motherfucker? The implosion of The Foundation is a multi-faceted clusterfuck in and of itself, but the imminent threat of government to manipulate volatile marketplaces poses a constant threat antithetical to whatever would stand to replace cryptocurrency as we understand it.
Remember one thing; the current engineering blueprint is obsolete. There a bubble ripe for financial catastrophe for the disruption of whatever takes its place.
>>5143954
Essentially, yeah. The susceptibility for hegemonic supersedure will just become more advanced concurrent with the technology to resist the infiltration thereof.

itt. hacks of the crypto world