/biz/ - Business & Finance

13BVMEgmQCCmfH54vL3FSZMyTV7fuJ9aLZ
gib three hunred btc

>>4034183
13BVMEgmQCCmfH54vL3FSZMyTV7fuJ9aLZ
Send me 300 BTC. Thanks!

13BVMEgmQCCmfH54vL3FSZMyTV7fuJ9aLZ

The basic point to be made is that contemporary Quantum Theory breaks down (we break it down on purpose) its rigor when it becomes empirical. This particular part I can talk about because I work with condensed matter physics. What we tend to do is assume systems can be approximated to what they would be if no "external things" to the system existed. From this assumption we use empirical data to derive functions that describe the very particular situations we are trying to describe (in my case we base ourselves in something called the Kohn-Sham equations). Problem is, even this approximation is a "formal operation" that does not actually hold any consistency within mathematics in spite of agreeing with experiment with as many decimal places as we want. Quoting from the link I gave:

"Mathematically rigorous formulations of QFT, such as Wightman's axiomatic QFT and algebraic QFT, provide clear conceptual frameworks within which precise questions and answers to interpretational issues can be formulated. However, they are sorely lacking with regards to facilitating the derivation of empirical consequences." - I concede though, I don't really know about the foundations of quantum mechanics, I only use the parts of it (that I know) are not rigorous.

Give me 300BTC. For no reason.

13BVMEgmQCCmfH54vL3FSZMyTV7fuJ9aLZ

please, thank you
13BVMEgmQCCmfH54vL3FSZMyTV7fuJ9aLZ

You can donate to me.
13BVMEgmQCCmfH54vL3FSZMyTV7fuJ9aLZ