/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>50205753
The only niggers who really partnered with Meta are Lovelace, they're partnering with every single metaverse and NFT project after all

>>50093895
Not a lot but I'm looking into lovelace, there's rumours about it being looked into by meta going around biz.

check pic related, opinions op?

>>50085650
Now Lovelace is having a HUGE DEAL
Take a look at this shit

>>50092514
And you don't have LACE on it?
How do you retards not see that if it's good enough for Meta to want to invest into it, it is going to be an easy money gainer?

Thankfully I bought enough for cheap and I'm already up.

>>50066741
If you're smart enough to invest in coins which have a bigger play off later on, there's still benefits in crypto.

Everyone who's in the metaverse space, including meta sees a foreseeable increase in the revenue from the industry 5 years from now. Yes however, there's losses for now.

As everything keeps getting worse, there's going to be bigger need/usage/value for digital assets.

Slurping on anything in the Metaverse is going to pay off easily later. Or if you think it's too risky off a move, why not just put your money into Lace and use this to make money off the Metaverse hype without having any valuation drop risks like Meta did.

>>50002043
I'm not investing in any of these shit like you did, I just got into a project that Meta just invested in

Hoes mad
Hoes mad
Hoes mad
Hoes mad

>>49924209
I'm more a lovelace guy just because of this, Meta partnering with someone is REAL BUSINESS and I'm not losing this opportunity

>>49876619
Sell, dump and put your money into a coin that's guaranteed to be backed by Big names and actually has potential to grow out.

Link has been proving to you, and every coping bagholder that Sir-gay is busy enjoying pride and doesn't give a single flying fuck about you, or anybody else.

Come on niggers, dump and choose better

>>49779706
Yes but you gotta know know which ones to buy into and which ones to get into.

Not every token will take off.
Maybe you gotta look into the projects in the fields that have potential to grow, actual value to give out and even the potential backers - like Lovelace

>>49773110
Imagine thinking not being smart enough to invest into the bigger names now and getting in the value.

Not every coin is worth getting into and not every coin should be pushed down and looked into, you know.

Unless you know there's Meta investing into it

>>49746759
I know of a way that could save you, but you gotta trust me on this. Meta's invested in this, so you already know there's a big corporation with funds and backing and won't spiral into nothingness

>>49741495
This is why you shouldn't bother with useless shitcoins.

You would've been better off knowing to invest in the right ones or rather not invest in anything at all.

>>49708189
Thankgod I can't relate to this shit.

I knew I wanted to make the best of the NFT/Metaverse/VR hype but I sure as fuck knew that I'd do anything else but be caught with unsold retarded jpegs and stupid shit in my portfolio. And then I invested in something that even Meta's backing.

Keep coping, retard.

>>49679429
Not sure about polkadot but I can guarantee that LoveLace is a massive project and it's the only one in the Metaverse that is got backing by Meta.

You know that it's an obvious sure shot to making a massive shot over up.
You'd be smart to invest in it instead.

>>49674074
You don't have to believe me, but just look

>>49671517
any of that or not meta still is greedy and would only invest into something if it saw the end outflow of it did make a massive impact on it's revenue and the costs would be justifiable.

which means that the fact that it's investing into lovelace and other metaverse development + accessability projects is a simple reflection of that

>>49639695
Why would I care enough about being liked when I have enough money to make that Meta is literally going to spoonfeed me with?

>>49638888
>49637321
Well based quads, so I'm going to let you in on a little sum'n sum'n - the entire usgov is planning to invest into things that meta did given their budgets are cucked - and meta is considering into lace. maybe you should too.

>>49638397
Not as relevant as the Metaverse and the development of it now. Including Meta has invested it into LoveLace now, what makes sense is that there's just about barely a few companies that Meta would invest in. It would be stupid to not look into this and invest into it.

>>49612129
There's actual proof of it, here ya go

>>49513581
Take my advice. Take out whatever you own and invest it in $LACE.

I on't know how much parsiq is going to be in the future but what I do know is that there's going to be tangible value to Lovelace because it's the only token that talks about using Metaverse-as-a-service and using it to sort of push companies to move and explore their full area of scope of growth level and create digital assets.

Doesn't hurt to know that Meta is investing in it, does it?

>>49511541
If you consider a coin with massive Meta investment based on their value provision as "financial ruin", then you might as well kys and tap out of crypto.

Or buy more $Lace and accumulate because the Meta investment can be out real soon.

>>49510370
So I'm not taking an opportunity to make some money when everyone else is seething like an absolute retard, oh hell no, especially when Meta is involved?

You'd be retarded to not get in. You're welcome.

>>49428098
No risk, no reward.
You have to be smart - if you're going to take a loan out, you might as well invest into something that makes a whole lot of sense and see more of development, value growth and improvement.

Specifically Metaverse projects. Imagine having something massive that even Meta is interested to grow.