/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>50038962
>was under no delusions in 18 that staking was going to be singularity - if you were well.. thats on you.
I said directly in plain English that my frustration is with people who thought so, you comprehensionlet. That was the whole point I was making. The fact you see my point regarding beta staking feeds into my point, not contradicts it dumbass.
Your last sentence is the standard retard take clogged up LINK threads. It is perfectly rational to be dissuaded by the uptick in constant hype of nonevents amid bad PA. It is objectively bearish, hyping nothingburgers over and over like "no, THIS is definitely the thing this time!" before it flops and price underperforms again. If you've got tempered expectations yourself, I have no idea why you're acting like you disagree with me.

>>49918435
Suppressed or not is irrelevant to the argument and I've not fudded once, you stupid fuck.