/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>11691057
disrupts local weather (forms clouds and heat up local area downwind)
disrupts insect and bird acustic navigation, kills those that fly too close, disturbs mating and migration for land animals near it (land and sea), doesnt produce enough power for any industrial use

and if it hits its resonance frequency (either due to crappy design or from wind conditions) then it fucks with anyone/anything that can hear it

its ok for small amounts, or used in barren wastelands but wind energy farms devastate local wildlife (but they do emit no carbon, if you dont include mining and processing/construction costs)

>>11691144
you cant get cleaner than nuclear, "green" tech its terrible when compared to nuclear as far as emissions are concerned, its not even close

but still people dont like it because things people dont understand are scary