/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>21092922
>>21093055
>>21093111
>>21093399
>>21093899
>>21093999
>>21094733
>>21096199
>>21096333
>>21097522
Czeched comfy bread anons. We're all going to make it like this year

Pic of oatmeal anon on the day of ascension

>>16778072

>>16665844

>>16607854
>>16609134
IF BTC isn't just a random invention and IF there are some extra invisible hands guiding the cryptomarket, what would their goal be? Probably the same goal as all power structures imo, to increase control over threats to that power structure.

Here's my best guess: US three-letters fund their clandestine cryptography assets to create a stateless currency in the public sector. This currency is advertised for its security, however there is likely some way to circumvent or break the encryption used in a way that is not yet public knowledge (quantum computing? hardware backdoors into all chip manufacturers? backdoors into all network traffic combined with van eck phreaking techniques? Pick your poison).
If the currency works as advertised, it's extremely attractive to both criminal enterprises/terrorists AND noncooperative economic opponents of the US when tensions rise somewhere down the line (China, Venezuela, Russia, etc). As those nations rely more on blockchain finance, it serves to benefit the US ability to surveil and disrupt those economies. As a side-effect, it also happens to incentivize development of ways to break its own system, as a sort of perpetual bug-bounty. Also increases in computing tech for ASICs and entrepeneurs who fork with improvements. Along the way, it's easy for them to shape the market outcomes by subverting core development with blockstream or futures trading. It seems extremely suspicious how hands-off regulators have been with cryptoassets thusfar.

I think our economy is guided a lot more strongly than most people think. Look at how complimentary surveillance companies such as Google and Facebook cooperate with intelligence agencies, how they were funded and how they remain competitive today. A fun watch for those who don't know their history:
https://youtu.be/TbKxUYl3WSE

And yes, I think the same thing is happening again with chainlink. In its fully realized form, chainlink is more surveillance.

>>16264627
Strong meme magic

>>16260317

they crashed the market to buy more link

This whole thread is like a biz flashback episode.

btc will go to higher hieghts, so will

>>13274691
aaaaahhhhhhhhhhhh

ooooooooooo

>>12973515
I prefer Thomas's fork of link or even Steve's fork. Sergey's Vision is dead in the water

>>12970791
ohhhhhjhh we make it

>>12706729
I-I swung my linkies back in March and around 4,000 LINK. Pls don’t tell Sergey

>>12700401

>>12458903
I am never selling my linkies. They are mine and I won’t make them accessible.

>>12446652
Chainlink doesn't have to do much more on it's own. Another doubling is nothing, 25k sats. Next doubling maybe in the next months. Thats 50k sats or, +2400%.
BTC and everything else is at bottom. Completely bottom.
BTC rising +50%, means altcoins rise +100%. Alts are always a huge lot more volatile, up and downside. So BTC going back to 6k and 10k in the coming 6-12 months, would mean another x4 to x8 for LINK, in dollar.

A lot is up to the token/coin itself to rise, but a huge lot on top is always the whole marketcap that grows. Ethereum was already top 2 when it made it's huge run and actually didn't rise that much in BTC value. Most of the bulllrun was caused by new money enterin crypto. Chainlink is currently running completely against the market, already x5 in BTC value and will take all the run-money in the next cycle. Thats why 1000$ will eventually get reached. Even tho 99% of people mean it was a meme. This shit will happen. And this extremely strong trend against the whole market proofs that LINK is such a token that will have the run of the year

Expect immense buy pressure

My first hint last month was Novagratz
Second hint is Excutivity

1 month and X days

Also hint: novagratz

Bullish my frens bullish, 1000$ is not a meme