[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance

Search:


View post   

>> No.11356838 [View]
File: 880 KB, 1900x1006, Blockstream.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11356838

>>11356810

Do you happen to have an argument?

>> No.11100570 [View]
File: 880 KB, 1900x1006, 1520482799841.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11100570

>>11100553
bitcoin could scale much better with a hard fork without even rising the block size.
On-chain scaling was intentionally sabotaged, there's no question.

>> No.11015220 [View]
File: 880 KB, 1900x1006, blockstream to sell sidechains.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11015220

>>11015210
bitcoin was sabotaged to create demand for blockstream sidechains.
Only the sabotage part of the plan worked.

>> No.10564313 [View]
File: 880 KB, 1900x1006, adam back.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10564313

it actually works as a p2p electronic currency.
adam back and bitcore want you to buy their bags and use side chains and second layers that go through (((them))).

>> No.10520293 [View]
File: 880 KB, 1900x1006, Blockstream.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10520293

>>10520260

Bitcoin CASH

>> No.10458799 [View]
File: 880 KB, 1900x1006, blockstream to sell sidechains.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10458799

>>10458639
going back? Mined coins are even worse, devs detect holders the same, but because they have no money they look for ways to sabotage the project for their own ends. Bitcoin is a perfect example.

In terms of treating holders:
shares (IPO) >> mining tax (zcash) > ICO > premine > purely mined coins
Mining tax is better than ICO because devs have a continued stake in the success of the project.
ZCash wasn't a particular success, but treatment of holders is miles ahead of ethereum.

>> No.10418311 [View]
File: 880 KB, 1900x1006, Blockstream.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10418311

Blockstream uses bitcoin as a way to leverage their own financial goals. They have full control of the git which allows them to stop blocksize increases. Why? because blockstream is financed through the sale of side-chains. If bitcoin functions smoothly, there is no demand for side chains

Bitcoin cash is bitcoin without the strangehold of blockstream. It is Peer-to-peer electronic cash.

>> No.10402667 [View]
File: 880 KB, 1900x1006, Blockstream.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10402667

>>10402645

Ironic because blockstream is a corporation which owns bitcoin you dumb shill

>> No.10374395 [View]
File: 880 KB, 1900x1006, Blockstream.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10374395

>>10373010
>Corecucks get sold out
>still support kikestream

kek

>> No.10206908 [View]
File: 880 KB, 1900x1006, Blockstream.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10206908

>>10206875

No idea what you're talking about

>> No.10074587 [View]
File: 880 KB, 1900x1006, Blockstream.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10074587

>>10074445

market confidence has been shattered. I can see a year/multiyear long bear market.

also friendly reminder for corecucks

>> No.10029948 [View]
File: 880 KB, 1900x1006, Blockstream.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10029948

>>10029930
>The main reason business left was bitpay, the only payment gateway that gave merchants USD payment was working with Roger and bitmain to push bcash

ahaha holy shit. EVERY business said they switched off bitcoin because of high fees. Delusional as fuck corecuck. Also miners doublespent on Bitcoin Gold; Non-mining nodes didn't do shit to stop them. You have no clue of what you're talking about

>> No.10018140 [View]
File: 880 KB, 1900x1006, Blockstream.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10018140

>>10018100

Lightning has not changed in the past 8 months. The software remains exactly the same.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]