/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>15304165
>>15304223
22:30, stupid beta starfish fags

>>14824907
1k eoy was always the target. Strong hands fellow stinky

>>14756580
This isn't shilling, it's information gathering, and it's literally the best thing /biz/ does. Staying up with this shit puts you 12 months ahead of the game.
OP, God's work etc.

>>11487777
Of course it's fucking 7s of all quads. Fucking hell...

What if:
1) There is not a strong speculative market for LINK tokens because non node operating holders are not incentivised through the usual memes like masternodes and dividends
2) There is not a huge number of node operators because the technical barriers of operating one are seen as too difficult to the vast majority of people, who could just set up a masternode on another token and let it run
3) The link supply actually adequately covers the number of node operators without requiring upward pressure on the individual token price.
So essentially the Chainlink network could be a success, it could create large amounts of value, node operators could get very wealthy, but none of these value drivers would be represented in the token price because the supply could adequately "cover" the niche cohort of technically literate node operators.

As far as I'm concerned this is the only FUD that makes any sense at all, and it's only FUD from an investment/speculation standpoint rather than a project standpoint. Am I wrong? I'd like to be.

I don't care if it takes to 2025 IDGAF.

Did anyone here contribute to linkpool? Are you concerned, after Thomas Hodges' latest video, that setting up a node is actually going to be fairly straightforward?

I've been bullish since the EOY announcement. Haven't wavered a bit.

>why the fuck would you even hold this?

checkum

150k
OC