/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>4948758
>>4948745

>>4944785
man where the fuck you been i have been posting this randomly over a year

it never gets any responses

the only reason this thread is getting responses is because they want it seen and talked about

try it yourself. try making threads. see how many of them are successful and get replies like this. go on, go try.

i know about the pills and the reds
i know about the jews and the satoshi

and i have seen some episodes of xra
but i can not for the life of me understand it
please someone pill me and not blue

All I have to say is if you think this is somehow the new rothschilds in control of all this shit now, you're delusional.
There is no way those kikes did not at worst, create it. At least, notice it and control it.
It's basically bilderberg vs china right now.
This could be world war 3
But just don't go fucking thinking that this is somehow new rothschilds and the old money will just go away and not be protected in any form.
Just look at all their priceless wealth. Estates, winery. mining operations, media control. Even if they somehow lost all their fiat cash it would only be a matter of time before they ruled it all again. They built the state of israel and control the worlds finances. I'm sure they had the long game to be in this in some way shape or form.
Fucking delusional if you think not.

>>4052666

>>4009113
keep going.
deeper...
deeper....
oh so moist

>>2774558
you realize Forbes list is just the PUBLIC list of rich people, from his stock holdings mostly. stocks they hold like this are public.

But what about the private holders? They never talk about private wealth, because its PRIVATE.

Bill gates might be one of the riches public, but privately he is still just a bitch.

Rothschild = Satoshi

>>2175151
Rothschild have been calling for a 100% digital currency since the 90s at least.

>>1934946
>>1934943
why not then call it silvercoin
why lite?
what does gold and silver have to do with lite?
silver is not so much more 'lite' than gold. plus it is more reflective. so why not reflective coin? why lite

Hello biz. I think I know the answer to my question but I'd like verification.
When reading on these coin sites about their trading fees.
Example.
Order Execution
Executed in the last 30 days (USD Equivalent) Maker fees Taker fees
$0.00 or more traded 0.100% 0.200%
$500,000.00 or more traded 0.080% 0.200%
$1,000,000.00 or more traded 0.060% 0.200%
$2,500,000.00 or more traded 0.040% 0.200%
$5,000,000.00 or more traded 0.020% 0.200%
$7,500,000.00 or more traded 0.000% 0.200%
$10,000,000.00 or more traded 0.000% 0.180%
$15,000,000.00 or more traded 0.000% 0.160%
$20,000,000.00 or more traded 0.000% 0.140%
$25,000,000.00 or more traded 0.000% 0.120%
$30,000,000.00 or more traded 0.000% 0.100%

Now is the 0.200% equal to a 20% selling fee?
Or is it 0.2 of 1%
Ones seems really high, and one really low.
So I'm assuming it is 20% fee dropping down to 10% fee if you trade huge volume.
So if it is 20% then who the fuck trades these things because that is astronomical usury type fees. Or am I wrong and 0.2 is 1/5th of 1%, which I doubt.
Thanks for the help.

What a bunch of JEWS

Order Execution
Executed in the last 30 days (USD Equivalent) Maker fees Taker fees
$0.00 or more traded 0.100% 0.200%
$500,000.00 or more traded 0.080% 0.200%
$1,000,000.00 or more traded 0.060% 0.200%
$2,500,000.00 or more traded 0.040% 0.200%
$5,000,000.00 or more traded 0.020% 0.200%
$7,500,000.00 or more traded 0.000% 0.200%
$10,000,000.00 or more traded 0.000% 0.180%
$15,000,000.00 or more traded 0.000% 0.160%
$20,000,000.00 or more traded 0.000% 0.140%
$25,000,000.00 or more traded 0.000% 0.120%
$30,000,000.00 or more traded 0.000% 0.100%

>>949275
Yes one should never listen to kikes.
Very wise.