/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>4359600
>So I conclude they either don't try/give a fuck because they are full autists, or they already got rejected and don't want to state it publicly in order to prevent another price drop.
Idk I also thought about this, I don't see a reason why Bittrex would reject them. I'm still haunted by the meaning of pic related, this is some 4D chess communication.
A bigger exchange listing would definitely help them look more legitimate because they're shit at communicating. The project looks really shady being only on Binance + team keeping quiet.

>>4359695
Why are you against big exchanges? That's where every legit project gets listed and Binance is a low volume chinese exchange.
>I don't give a fuck about exchanges, I'm not selling a sinle LINK before it reaches at least 2-3bn MC
This is not happening on Binance, that's why we need big exchanges. When the big news come, it will have to be on a big exchange to grow like it should.

>>4359765
Here's Rory's cryptic reply.

>Seriously, the REQ team openly stated that they are actively seeking exchanges.
I've mentioned this in Chainlink slack multiple times when someone says they're under NDA, people are retarded.

What the fuck do we make of this?

>can't comment
>we're open

Why is every other team able to comment on exchanges except this one?
Please explain to me I'm dying to know what the hell is going on here for weeks now.