/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>26414464

>>23626761
>Other tokens have staking, has one ever failed and if it did what happened to people's bags?
Well then they would be worthless. And yes projects have "failed" or have been scams.

>>23357441
I agree. It's annoying hearing people say "I knew about BTC back then. If only I had just bought in.". How many opportunities have there been to make shit tonnes of money in this market alone? Most people aren't intelligent enough to recognise potential and they aren't willing to put the time and effort into research. They are unwilling or even just simply unable to extrapolate more than two days into the future and then they complain about missed investment opportunities. Even amongst the few who are able to recognise these opportunities, very few of them are willing to put a significant portion of their wealth on the line. Even fewer will have the patience to wait and hold. What these people don't realise is that if they had bought BTC at $5, they would have sold at $40. And to top it all off these same people will claim that making it in crypto is "gambling" and based on luck because they're projecting their ignorance onto others. These same people are sleeping on Lition.

>>23279656
>>23279656
I'm convinced that CLV and Clover42 are made by the same guy so he can shill both projects at once.

>>23235061
>The fact that is has a valid use case
One of the weirdests criticisms I've ever seen.
>will never more than 2x from here.
But why won't it. Will Lition Energy customers only do a 2x from here? Will no new sidechains open? It's incredibly obvious you're FUDing to accumulate.

>>23045286
Copy and paste FUD. Move on.

>made an account on robinhood
>deposited 500 dollars instantly after bank verification
>bought stock

This is terrifying.

>>22755526
>saw that UNI kept getting fucked by BTC
>decided that it would keep going down and decided to start swinging it
>realize now that swinging is easier when a coin is bearish and can be counted on to go down than when a coin is volatile and randomly dumps a dollar and then pumps a dollar fifty

I wish I had all my UNI back.

>>22742506
>>22742516
>It can't be fake because it's clearly a received message
Lol. It can be photoshopped. But anyway they didn't even bother to share the whole message. Why not share the entire window? Also common sense tells you that Mark wouldn't be dumb enough to sell OTC. No one would buy that, instead they would sell everything they had left. If Mark was actually selling then he would do it through an exchange.

Why does LIT have the dumbest FUD ever? Why do you literally just make stuff up? You even have all the time in the world to create a well thought out narrative and yet you make one that doesn't make any sense.

>>22474995

>>22453445
I am honestly scared bros, hold me down, if this happens mom said I will have to find a real job

>>22429854
Cope.

>>22429942
Based.

>>21918825
Yeah Mark was unaware of that. He hasn't made the same mistake again. But this is a routine thing that you for some reason put a major negative spin on.
>also still waiting for "team has the right to sell ecosystem tokens
They've given more ecosystem tokens to stakers and burns than they have sold. They sell less than Sergey. Selling ecosystem tokens is another way of distributing them. Who cares?

>>21903415
Here, have the lition version
>>21902982
Looking sharp in that suit fren

>>21781440
>shoulda bought VIDT morons, like you were told
Where do you come from? Why are VIDT and EWT shills so obsessed with Lition? We never think about you, but that doesn't stop you from infiltrating our threads.

>>21589416
Go on... reveal the shitcoins you're in instead of sweet sweet litties

>>21516208
Since when has the previous short term speculative price movement of a project indicate the value of that project? You can do that kind of analysis with any project but it's still pretty useless. Also you investing at ATH is no one's fault but your own. You literally just FOMOd into a project that you knew nothing about then complained when you lost money. Your argument has nothing to do with utility or potential ROI.

But anyway I'm not sure why I care about some dipshit who only has $288 to spend into crypto lol.

>>21360192
Why do this after making more than half of the recent litgens

>>21321533
What are you even talking about? We were 6 cents a month ago.

>>21169878
How is it not a good look?

>>21169899
I swear we have about 50 people asking this everyday. Q3. Specific date should be announced soon.

>>21101379
Think this is the answer. Pajeets can't pump and dump a legit project. Also confirms 99% of biz threads are scams.
>>21101538
Cope

>>21092766
None of your responses are actual arguments. You could literally just copy and paste them and it would apply to any crypto.

>>21019761
I would be shocked if it didn't.

>>21020046
I'm not the insider.