/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>54722140
>>54722715
Each day it becomes one grade more difficult to distract myself enough that I'm not haunted by the memory of feeling that I was almost there. At least, a young semi-retired home-owner. I have a good job too, F500, 80k salary plus a ton of benefits, but my soul's been dead for years. I've really lost myself. I have no conviction anymore because my convictions have burned me. Hope just feels like a drug I kicked an addiction to and can't afford to take up again. I poured myself into hobbies last year before I took a vacation but it's been a brutal return to reality this year, all the more punishing a reflection from within a wage cage I had the keys to unlock just a few years ago. I don't really know what I'm waiting for anymore either. I know it's never coming.

>>50698151
For me it was just the suggestion LINK was out of position. That impies selling LINK to reposition, implies bringing up the idea maybe the bullrun dries up before we get momentum. You'd rather postulate about reasons etc rather than observe objectively and draw an actionable interpretation. That's where the point of difference is. This kind of thing in LINK threads though is like bath salts to the snowflakes. They all go apeshit at the suggestion and resort to trying to discredit with slurs or coming up with ulterior motive theories or whatever, which is exactly what the fuck the other anon is doing right now. OP just resonates more after that exchange. It's a totally bizarre point to take from what I wrote and start contesting.

>>49764483
This.
Totally bemusing how LINK schizo headcanon still gets these retards excited. LINK is a proven underperformer by now, underperformed as long or longer than it overperformed. I don't think there is a single coin that has ever been in the top 5, then plummeted to rank 30, then recovered to the top 5. It's more like a run of the mill shitcoin than anything special. That's reality. Facts. Not all this other shit. As someone who squandered an entire bullrun, I'd warn anyone about getting in too deep with these retarded theories that are proven bullshit time and time again. Most "OGs" are at the point they're just too proud to reconcile with the truth. Sad.

>>49306432
The point is the PA has shaken some's conviction though. Some anons have come to terms with their true risk tolerance over the past 2 years, distracted with missed opportunities, and as they broaden their horizons they notice a poor macro outlook, probably a deep asset bubble, that all sorts of black swans can happen, and that they're still waiting for their real lives to reflect the gains of their paper money, usual bear market perspective. Anons like you on the other hand might just look at it and say "well, we're all here to take risk and LINK's r/r seems the most valid place", which I think is true, but I don't think there's such thing as full conviction anymore as many have learned their risk tolerance is different to their perception, or has changed unnoticed over time, a la the "too old to ride the lightning" OG.