/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>50789832
We're getting there friend.

I don't even know what short, long, farm, yield mean. I've never used metamask or uniswap or defi. I've just been holding 200k LINK since 20 cents.I'm never selling.

$23k when LINK hit $4. I'm at $11k now lmao

>>14769821
>literally 100s of teams
Every crypto project worth their their salt that needs off chain data announced a partnership with Chainlink.
C O P E

I can't say much

It's going to correct hard once between now and july and then you'll never be able to buy a LINK token under $1 again

I used to be 40% Chainlink and 60% various shitcoins. I'm 99% LINK now without making one trade. Chainlink saved me.

Can governments help the legal tech sector to grow? The short answer is: yes, they can. A case in point is how the British Government and especially the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) is helping about as much as it can at present to boost the legal tech sector in the UK.

An example of this was a special event held near Parliament earlier this week in London, organised by the MoJ, to showcase British legal tech talent and home-grown companies working in the legal tech sector here.

the Lord Chancellor, the Minister in charge of the MoJ, David Gauke took time out to promote and support the growth of legal tech companies and encourage lawyers to use this technology.

he wants to create ‘an environment where law tech can thrive’, he recognised clients were keen to embrace new ways of conducting some aspects of legal work, such as via automation, and that he and the Government in general were very keen to see the UK’s legal tech sector grow and in turn help the legal sector here retain its position on the world stage.

noted the importance of the commercial courts in UK, which handle many international matters and the fact that around 40% of all international arbitrations are under English law. The UK is also home to many of the largest law firms in the world.

if the legal market falls behind on legal tech, if it cannot meet client needs on matters such as efficiency, then the legal sector falls behind, and that’s not just bad for lawyers and their clients, it’s bad for the economy as a whole.

Gauke say that he wanted the UK to be a centre for the development of smart contracts and that he noted the work of the Accord Project in particular.

‘If smart contracts will one day be part of the fourth industrial revolution then I’d like to see them developed here and under English law,’ said Gauke.

And, it’s fair to say that there is some great work going on here with companies such as Clause, led by Peter Hunn, who is also working with the Law Tech Delivery Panel (LTDP).

Watch these videos
https://youtu.be/ofr9tRXTId0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5yrLuo3x5l0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Nuvaf48f_E
Pay special attention to the liquidity auction portion of the design
I should make you guess but I won't cos fuck it

- Celer IS a working (right fucking now for real) example of a scaleable network that can allow the kind of throughput and obfuscation for widespread adoption of simple smart contracts
- Celer made the decision within their trilemma to weight heavily in favor of needing large amounts of high asset value liquidity to function
- The thing that will allow any on chain asset to be used as liquidity backing is a decentralized network to provide always on, reliable prices for those assets
- Smart contracts can exist right now in the real world with the following:
Access to data
Access to scaling
Access to traditional payment rails

Ever wonder why a blue chip project abandoned a guaranteed 30mm ico?

Because smart contracts can't exist without Celer
and Celer can't exist without Chainlink
and Chainlink will be the dominant value reserve asset for the network on which nearly all smart contracts run

Congrats on this
Seriously