/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>57361130
>>57361147
>>57361287
Please tell me you’re just memeing

Why is link poompa’ing? It’s not suppose to poompa. It’s poopoocoin. Where is the soopressa’ing?

We get a bullish article from a major institution shilling the fuck out of chainlink and we barely pump 1%.

But when a literal who twitter faggot tweet a recycled shit fud we dump 6%?

I always knew goyim are retarded, but I didn’t know it was this bad. No wonder (((they))) treat us like animals.

>>29980852
>sats

https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3038406#references-widget

>Another set of problems, unrelated to blockchains per se, concerns the subject matter
of smart contracts. Apart from the theoretical question whether full automation (i.e.
self-enforcement) of certain obligations is advisable, it must be acknowledged that
from a practical perspective, only some contractual obligations can be expressed in
code and only some obligations can be regarded as computationally ascertainable.
Consequently, smart contracts may be suitable for a rather narrow range of
transactions. They are difficult to envisage for contracts involving obligations relying
on such concepts as “reasonableness,” “best efforts” or for obligations the fulfillment
of which requires an overall evaluation of contractual performance. Given their
inability to fully reflect and allow for the complexities of the real world, the practical
use of smart contract may thus be limited.

I read through this entire thing and the author does a pretty good job of putting smart contract worshippers in their place. At the end of the day, the only thing that smart contracts are reasonably useful for is quick and mutually agreed upon transactions... which is what the original bitcoin was intended to be for anyway. There are technologically insurmountable problems pertaining to the very nature of code as a medium of transmitting information that make smart contracts unviable for any sort of legally binding agreement other than a simple conditional payment. What do you guys think

>nu pumps like 20%
>prq pumps like 30%
>rbc pumps like 30% after being down 70%

So is this alt season? Kind of, you know, shitty

>>28765051
Shut up newfag you don't get to rate my portfolio.

>why learning english if you could poo in loo

>>28088536
>sats

>>27843018
>sats

>>27472181
>Ukraine

>>25738722
>1mm is making it

>>25729995
the word isn't used in its clinical contex. it's used as a colloquial term for the predilection to obsess over systematic activities like research or shitposting.

>>25331328
>Staking already leave

>>25278416
>I hold an asset that will be liable for an lawsuit
>yes Im retarded, so what?

Why is CLF dumping?

>>24906789
>uninspired jojomeme that fails to capture why people conflated jojo with trump 5 years ago (HINT: S4 AIRED JUST 9 MONTHS AFTER S3 ENDED) created by some dumb fuck who also made Biden green because pepe is green right?

This is so obviously something some shill paid for thinking it would 'appeal to the kids' or some other lunacy.

>>24883081
>sats

>>24882822
>on binance

>>24311136

>Drudge

>>24240129
is that what a women's vagina looks like?

>>24199317

>>23272446
>14 eth

>>23193435
>years from now
this is also an important point, as i htink we can all agree 'years from now' eth phases will have been rolled out and rollups etc would make stake obsolete.

sorry friend, the window is closing.