/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>15003580
This is the latest “meme” out of ChainLink Debate Labs memebase? Cringey.

>be able to easily slip away with $50 million each and live like a literal king in any 1st world country of your choosing
>set for your great grandchildren to be rich NEETs and oligarchs
>stick around to try and ‘solve’ the ‘oracle problem’

Imagine being this naive. They’re not starry eyed faggots like you, they took the money like anyone else would.

Do you honestly believe they’re trying to be billionaires with their little JSON Parser and $5 t-shirts? Would you leave $50-100 million to try and solve ‘the oracle problem’?

>>14975061
Two years and zero advancements other than buying blog posts with ICO money. Vapourware in literal and undeniable terms by anyone’s standards apart from desperate bagholders. Decentralized oracles are a fucking meme, you’d understand if you knew tech.

>hey guys let’s have 3,478,529 nodes verifying the information from the same singular data source

Only an absolute mouth breathing troglodyte would think this has any purpose whatsoever. You had two years to read the whitepaper which doesn’t even make mention of how to deploy decentralized oracles. Oracle services already exist, they work and are profitable.

>>14894287
>So you're creating a new type of product (Scam) that doesn't fit neatly into any existing (scam) categories and may or may not end up drawing the ire of US regulators at some point down the road. Why would you risk creating this product in the jurisdiction of a nation with heavy regulation? How many ICOs actually did this? Can you name some "legitimate" projects that did?

I’m glad you overcame your text stutter and finally fucking typed something out. Alright let me obliterate this. You can never do actual work in the US, with US companies trusting you if you do not have the oversight of the US authorities like what they have upon them. You’ll never do any real meaningful work like that unless you’re a foreign titan in a country with working laws.

Chainlink, operating out of a rented pidgeonhole in the Caymen Islands with no assets does not fit this description. Regulation means order and trust. I think it’s funny that the same companies that you’d like to see Chainlink ‘partner’ with are what they are because they’re American companies under the jurisdiction of the US, yet you’re now shitting on those same rules and laws being applied to Chainlink. Nice cognitive dissonance you got there lad.

It’s not even a new kind of product if it even existed as a product which it currently doesn’t. Enterprise API aggregation has been around for years. So all in all, fundamentally you have no valid points as to why Chainlink is registered in the Caymen’s out of a shoebox and Americans were barred from their ICO. I’m guessing you don’t genuinely believe what you typed out though, you’re just hoping someone else does.

>>14794294
>dip
>700,000 tokens a day dumping for the next 1.5~ years (350m allocation)
>>>>>>>>”dip”

Sergey has made it. This was for him to make money, how could you ever think this project served YOU?

>>14771469
>blogpost from a dev
>Google Cloud member with 8,000 other companies
>partnership

AHHHHHHEEEEEEEE
AHHHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHE
>dev dump
AAAAHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHE