/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>52676867
(you)
>>52676931
n-neets don't "work"

>>52648581
i-i was joking, it wasn't so literal. i thought it were a friendly statement. if you didn't like my (you)s you wouldn't be replying to me.
nonetheless, we are one, so technically anyone is everyone

>>50761754
>move on to a different project
d-dont think i have a choice anyway considering what i wrote. some of the devs lurk here and i exposed myself as way to autistic for anything. maybe i should just try to make chainlink adopt some my ideas rather than working on my own. i dont even care about what gets adopted in the end
>create your own
>move on to a non-retarded project, but you will find none
kindelia seems like a perfectly fine blockchain. they only need to spend more effort on zk. not having a platform is actually a very smart decision since there is no upper bounds on how much profits mining can generate. and this is a sustainable design long-term, unlike most projects swiping fundamental tokenomics design flaws under the rug
>if you dont simply want to scam people
dont want to reinforce scams but all systems need some level of biases in order to survive. dealing with the nonsense pulled by normies is somehwat fine
>disgusting incompetent team
they seem competent, but attached to a narrow definition of what a successful blockchain must be like. there are countless example of crypto scams crumbling down like terra or celsius, they should take their ecosystem more seriously i think
>>50768210
>>50769493
>