/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>14059486

If humans are innately cooperative than capitalism is not the best system because we should be inclined to compete more than dominate.

If humans are innately competitive it is in the interest of the 99% to use culture to force some cooperation to prevent being dominated by most vicious 1% still making capitalism not the best.

If humans innately a mix of the two and dynamically can switch between cooperation and competition given the context (this one is most likely) than it makes sense to culturally pursue cooperation for much the same reason as if we were entirely selfish and competitive by nature.

In any case, if nature is unjust than change nature. We have technology and culture, something animals don't and as such are not bound to our nature. Anyone making an argument that we are simply doesn't understand how innate traits work or how they can be suppressed or even mostly eliminated through cultural conditioning.

In any circumstance capitalism is a shite option if you're not already a billionaire. Although I do recognize the need for it in limited capacity for certain industries sometimes.

Is 205 ETH enough to make it?

Firstly. IQ is bullshit, our brains are plastic. But to answer your question. 135 actually psych tested IQ anon here. (Public school tested me in high school because they thought I was autistic) I am a 21 year old natural sciences major with a 3.41 GPA, a girlfriend, 2 close friend groups, a modest network of connections and I helped found a biohacking conference in my city. We're putting on our second biannual conference in the upcoming fall and people from all around the world are attending although there will likely be less than 100 attendees as it's very much filled with people who actually do science not enthusiasts.