/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>50369647
Be clear with what you mean then. Fact is there is no problem syncing nodes because sharded resource utilization makes syncing it fast and scalable, there is no problem with incentives as running a setup that covers all chains is feasable and makes sense economically.
Your valid point is that it's costly to set up a node with multiple locations. This is true. Yet not a problem if you really want blockchain to take over the world. If your problem with kadena is that it doesn't run on a laptop I think it's a fair opinion and you should sell.

>>50369667
1. Fair. Will change over time otherwise I'd be out.
2. Incorrect but I see where you're coming from, to think this won't change over time is retarded to the point where it makes you look like an idiot for even bringing it up
3. They control platform emissions, not miner emissions you illiterate retard
4. It's literally not and doug is working on tools to make it even easier than it already is. This one point should showcase to everyone that you are not being serious.
5. people will be mass running nodes because it makes economic sense to do so. Even if don't the fact you can run a subset is great for decentralization either way.

This is all I have to say.