/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>8100110
We already knew that big business would use Hyperledger and private blockchain rather than Ethereum, etc.

But your argument is only strengthening the need for LINK.

>Each industry will create their own specific blockchains for their specific purpose

Yes, we knew that, you dumb nigger. Which is why LINK, a tool that allows each blockchain to communicate with eachother and real world information will be a critical part.

>>7867893
>A potential ~33% loss
>No way BTCP is going to be trading higher than ZCL, since the vast majority of ZCL holders are aching to unload their bags on the non-existent masses they believe will flock to their BTCP

If you bought in below $100, I suppose you're in an alright position. Although I'd wager that it's a waste of fucking time relative to the rest of the markets.

But by all means, it's your money to lose. I just want you to remember this when you ask yourself why nobody wants to buy your Bitcoin Private for $200.

>cashed out $5.8M from ETH
>still have a $700k folio
>still live in same small 40 sqm apartment
>still only go outside to buy groceries
>still no friends

Eh. Feels good being able to buy what I want when I need it, but it's not about the money anymore. I just like crypto, and as sad as it is, you fucks are my only friends.

>SEED partnership being publicly announced next week, which means Arab richfags will FOMO in
>24h trading volume is already stable at $8M~ which is insane for any coin below $100M mcap
>High trading volume means Binance wants a piece of the pie for those sweet fees
>CEO of Binance attended the Jibrel conference, which makes a listing even more likely

But go ahead. Sell now because it's trading sideways. Buy into something that has already mooned.

>BTC rises 50% since its bottom
>Small 8% dip on the way up
>Retards panic

Whoever sold needs a fucking neckshot.

They're using malware that searches through your computer for MEW private keys.

Preferred method of delivery is usually to make a fake ICO page with an exploit kit that delivers the malware.

You'd have to be completely fucking braindead not to use a ledger, or at least keep all private keys and the usage of private keys on an isolated computer.

http://fortune.com/2018/02/06/bitcoin-price-cftc-sec-cryptocurrency-hearing/

>“We owe it to this new generation to respect their enthusiasm for virtual currencies, with a thoughtful and balance response, and not a dismissive one,”
>“Sixty-six million tons of American soybeans were just handled through a blockchain transaction by the Dreyfus company to China. So Bitcoin is now being used, it’s being used in our American transportation and logistics system,”
- J. Christopher Giancarlo, Chairman of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission

>“I hope people pursue it vigorously,”
- Jay Clayton, Chairman of the SEC. Nominated by Donald Trump

>"The crypto market could be worth $20 trillion by 2020"
- Senator Mark Warren, the wealthiest US Senator as of 2012 and a pioneer in cellphone technology

>"However, recent developments, such as the listing of Bitcoin futures contracts by US exchanges, could lead European banks too to hold positions in Bitcoin, and therefore we will certainly look at that."
- Mario Draghi, President of the European Central Bank

It would take a special kind of retard to sell after this.

>SEC, CFTC and US Senate sit for several hours and talk about how crypto is the future
>The new cellphone, the new internet, the new wireless
>Makes it clear that they see crypto as a technological battlefront where China is big, and they don't intend to lose
>They sound like /biz/fags shilling crypto
>US government endorsement restores faith in crypto
>B-b-but there's a small dip on the way up

>>6880580
See >>6879727

I bought in yesterday, anticipating retards would expect an A. Then I sold an hour before the release.

You're in for a major dissapointment if you believe the ANNOUNCED roadmap release will create a surge of buyers. Of course, unless something unexpected appears on it.

>>6215118
Since you thought solving the oracle problem had anything to do with using BTC as a currency, I'll use an example I saw yesterday which dumbs it down to the kindergarden level:

>You and a friend bet on a football game
>You make a contract which states that if your team wins, you get $100. If his team wins, he gets $100
>None of you get to watch the game live
>The day after you check a website which says your team won
>Your friend checks another website which says his team won
>Woah! But who won the bet?
>What if the contract was connected to decentralized oracles which does not feed bad information?

With ChainLink in place, the nodes would automatically transfer reliable information to the contract right after the game. And the contract would send $100 to you or $100 to your friend.

Now imagine this with derivatives or insurance. Which is where it is most likely to be adopted.