/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>29795610
yes it's totally a meme bro

>>29751857
The risk is that the market crashes deep enough for long enough that you never recover or at least have to sit on >50% losses for years

keep in mind all this hinges on my assumption that the y scale on the top chart is %. if that is the case:
do people posting this in some attempt to discount TQQQ vs QQQ realize it is literally showing that holding TQQQ even AFTER getting bogged by the dot com crash and never selling until the present STILL returned 3x the nasdaq? its like high 33000% for TQQQ and about 11500% for the nasdaq. did everyone just look at the pictures of the lines and not the scales?

>>27964694

>>27846257
THIS WILL HAPPEN TO YOU

>>27799205
Because of >>27799116
With a 2x you have a lower risk of ruin/decay into nothingness. But still a big enough crash will wipe you out it's just less likely to happen.

>>27799280
>>27799330
That applies if you're buying and holding a diversified portfolio but not if you're holding a few shit stocks or gambling on short term options

>>27708298

>>27456137
tqqq is too risky without actively managing it

>>26311644
Sure but not as hard.