/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>214644
>Please continue furiously stamping your little Internet feet though, it is entertaining.
The irony is hilarious.

>>214650
>you get BTFO
HAH

Have you fucking been here since this board was created?

>actually studied economics
>ACHUKLLYY UNDERSTAND
Enjoy your debt slavery for your keynesian professor.

>Mises "dun need no math" bubble
Austrian economics does plenty of math.

>They aren't always rational, but when it comes to money they are PREDICTABLE
Seeing keynesian failures the past few decades, not so much lol

>psuedo-science shit Misesfags use called praxeology.
Even though our theories called the great depression while keynes was clueless.
Even though we called this depression and you cunts were CLUELESS.
>b-b-but like maybe 2 of of said something about it so that means we called it too

>are written by free market proponents.
Central banking is anti free market.

>Church of Mises.
You are BY DEFINITION a religious fundie.
Seriously.

>Mises borrows their "evidence" from these schools
When it supports their theories, yes.
Nothing wrong with this.

>but when they try to support their fringe ideas such as the abolishment of monetary policy
We have plenty of evidence on our side.

Look at the fucking gilded age.
Are double digit rates of economic growth, massive price decreases, massive wage increases, and low unemployment something you don't understand?

Oh and those "panics" that occurred during those times, what are government economic controls

>he literally says that empirical evidence isn't necessary
Is empirical evidence necessary for mathematics?
That was his point.

Is free trade Marxist? Marx supported it and it seems like free market capitalists are split--even Mises who is considered hardcore capitalist to the point of inspiring modern anarchocapitalism seemed to have been only in favor of free trade in special mutually beneficial cases that have to meet a certain criteria.

Quite frankly, I don't know where I stand as I see the positives and negatives of each and don't know which is better.

>>48456
>math and logic are bullshit because they're a priori
Lel