/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>55759221
seriously?
you know the project better than this...
it is clear from context that jonny is just giving a generic answer
someone should go ask directly in the chat:
>will chainlink labs provide the delegation system for node operators in future?
the answer will be the same as in attached picture

>>52704584
it's all so tiresome
obviously you can stake on other nodes... but everyone will be staking through linkpool's staking infrastructure
the major nodes have all started announcing that they're going to use it
https://twitter.com/stakedotlink
and lpl holders will get a cut of all of this

>>49382451
good summary but i think worth point out that at least initially nodes will be using linkpool's staking infrastructure, at least as far as i can see
unless another project is building in stealth there won't be a trustless staking mechanism for retail
linkpool's heavily audited solution will therefore become the de facto front end for staking and get a lot more eyes on it and be another revenue stream