/biz/ - Business & Finance

Never read more of a projection holy fuck get a grip you fucking gimp

>>13303779
Delusional

>>13156205
1. It will survive
2. Almost finished (?) but id wanna know why he thinks it isnt
3. reee
4. api argument is dumb
5. auditing is growing
6. stablecoins
7.central to decentrialized point isnt an issue since itll never be solved and wasnt intended to be
8. no competition since standard
9. economics is fucked i agree that

Bored so I'll shit on your FUD
(1/2)

>witnet has the first mover advantage and the best product
Developing a product with business development / standards in mind vs an obscure non-agnostic solution that's in a completely different realm than Chainlink?

>openlaw is now using rhombus for the juiciest contracts (derivatives)
They're considering all options as they should, Rhombus is not even close to Chainlink and their connections. Not an argument.

>swift is working with ripple, poc was only bond coupons
Come on man don't be dumb Ripple is SWIFT's direct competition. It is a fair point that the PoC revolved around bonds, one thing to consider was just how early this occured during Chainlinks history.

>eth can't scale
Why not? Do you understand truly the unknown territory they're entering is?

>gonser chat was a flop, stuttering pothead, gonser doesn't work at ds anymore anyway, gonser is a moron who literally got scammed by a previous ico (SHOPIN)
Nobody knew Shopin would flop, not an argument.

>masters left digital asset because their dlts are btfo by Corda
Proof?

>sgx defeats the point of trust less ness, even ari admits it can't be trusted, it's just a high school project
Not a highschool project by any means. This whole Intel SGX being fundamentally flawed argument has been beat to death. Projects do not need to choose Intel SGX.

>permissioned chains, token is worthless
Higher efficiencies present themselves once the chain becomes public