/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>17159571
>What percent of your neurons are occupied with my existence?
None, until you poke your head in these threads. Take your meds and stop trying to call me, Telegram tard. I don't want to talk with you, unless other people can see you getting BTFO.

>>15731446

>>15574554
>I've never made one I just come here to fight you.
Good. Only thing that's interesting about VIDT threads is taking you bagholders down one by one like Punch Out. I'm yet undefeated (see: lack of fomo).

>It's not scheduled to exist until Spring 2020 that would be why.
So no idea if it will be successful at all. The consumer side was the most interesting part of this, according to past shill threads pre-July. What happen?

>>15503382
>This pasta has been reduted so many times over the past 6 weeks I don't know why he doesn't update it at all.
Burden of proof is on you. Every time I post the pasta it's "already been debunked" yet never any specifics.

>>15498471
>or a bot.
I wrote a bot yeard ago that identifies pedophile symbols on the internet so I can report them to authorities. It just happens that I got another use out of that script.

>Would love to argue but you're fud has been debunked over and over again.
No one debunked anything. Chuck E Cheese tokens also have a usecase inside their establishment, their API if you will, but in the real world they're useless and worthless and not needed. You can get one of those playtime cards now that allow you to play in the arcade for an hour for an unlimited time, almost like a quick subscription plan, you see.

>>15459090
>The funny thing is, based on the gifs and writing styles, I know who almost everyone here is fudding from the telegram.

>>15127336
>how cucked do you have to be to spend all your time fudding a coin cause you've been thoroughly assblasted by the telegram.

>>15122625
>That sergey guy posted a pic of a girl with cum dripping from her vagina with a sign that said '' sir gay vidt''
>Im starting to think that guy is the troll playing both sides.
No, he is just an impulsive retard that keeps getting BTFO and cannot mentally handle being verbally dominated to oblivion. See pic related. He's so insecure in himself and his investment, that he will go the lengths of shouting into his phone at a pub to voice-to-text argue on an anime board to post public photos of him having sex for internet high fives. Except no one gave a fuck about the picture other than for the lols of him getting banned.

Drunk and drugged out of his mind, so anything he has to say about VIDT I'd recommend ignoring.

>>15110075
>And if you want to be that pedantic, neither Clayton or the SEC have said VIDT is a security. Everything is conjecture and speculation.
Well, SEC outlines what counts as a security in plain English language, readable by all, and buybacks and burns are specifically mentioned, among other things. Clayton's mind however is not easily readable at this point in time. If you have specific direct quotes that strengthen your argument, from reputable sites, feel free to post them for other anons. It's your argument. And I don't care enough to read 50000 words by some boomer who candidly said his personal views and opinions.

>It's bad enough that you are here everyday because you want to "save anon's money." You waste time being as difficult to reason with as possible.
You can't out argue my points, because it's hard to argue against cold facts and someone who knows what they're talking about. The very fact that most of you Telegram trannies couldn't even figure out it was a security token until I sold, or even consider it as a possibility, says it all. I've been saying since the day I sold. Or even bother to calculate how much validations cost for V-ID and consumers and that it was overvalued by the time VIDT was near ATH.

I'm here to get you seething like pic related. Who posted in this thread earlier and got BTFO once again.

SEETHING & BTFO