/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>54000773
Testing

I'm a recent Uni grad (media and design related program) and I am coming to terms with the fact that I didn't really learn shit these past years. Partly my fault, partly school's fault, doesn't matter.

Are there any good guides y'all would recommend or have used to 'get good' at design. Something like a online class for UX or graphic design and the like (leaning more towards UX and UI). Something proper and comprehensive, not a YouTube video. Any good literature on learning design and UX and perhaps even the business around it would be appreciated.

I know this isn't about Chainlink, but I've seen similar posts here. It's about the business of design after all. Cheers.

Can anyone spare me some chainlink???? Please, I've lost everything. Even 10 Link I will be happy with

For real, where are the original (2017) nolinkers at right now? Did you guys ever capitulate, and just buy in? If you did, are you still in denial and plan on selling or >swinglinking, or do you finally get what it is that's going on?

>>15091960
Me as fuck

>>12827353
I'm actually more qualified to talk about this than most anons.I'm employed with a cyber-techno machinations company, I do a lot of security analyst programming type work. Open source, decentralized, APIs, partnerships, you name it. We'd be one of the first companies in line for something like Chainlink, if the decentralized smart contract space had more value over traditional data exchanges. There's a catch though, an underlying flaw more deeply embedded in the bedrock of LINK than the very code itself. The flaw is with the concept, and it's this: Companies won't actually go through the hassle of trusting their data API's through crypto.

Now I can already hear your keyboards going frantic, but hear me out. /biz/ hates banks, and traditional data providers. But actual companies, businesses, and investors do not. There's an old saying you might have heard of: "If it ain't broke, don't fix it!". The idea that any of our bosses would give us the go ahead if we approached them to put our companies valuable data in a smart contract on a cryptocurrency called Chainlink, that they've never heard of, we'd be laughed out at best and fired on the spot at worst. We already have API data buyers and providers we trust.

'But Chainlink is trustless!' I hear you cry, but is that really a good thing? Just listen to the sound of it. Businesses don't want to spend millions of dollars on something that is trustLESS, they want something trustFUL. 'But the reputation system!', doesn't that defeat the whole point of your coin? If companies only trust nodes with high reputation, what's the difference between trusting banks and data providers that already have reputation, but in real life not on a computer screen.

The fact is, LINK is going to share the same fate as ETH will. A lot of 'real world application' hype, with a lot of 'crypto world application' reality. Only, this billion supply coin isn't going to come close to the $1k that Etherum hit. Happy gambling though anons.

>>12753717

The concept of "Smart Contracts" is complete word soup bullshit. It's a fucking semaphore data structure, that's all. A second year compsci undergrad could have done this without millions of dollars in ICO money. Which please someone show me Chainlink's burn rate for that cash, because I'm really curious as to what happened with all of biz's money.

Go ask /sci/ if you don't want to believe me. They'll laugh your drop shipping ass right out of the thread.

> y'all are fucked

>>12515817

>>12496999
Checked and kekked

Damn it. Price eoy?

Don't forget who made you Serg

>>12419011

It's unbelievable, tommorow chainlink link be 500$!
Has world ever seen such financial miracle?

How the fuck do we stop the link pump? This is getting ridiculous

Marines! Report In!

>>11632804
We are unstoppable
$1000 eoy is possilbe

>>11627582
So people must be deluded then, when they say the price will skyrocket because of staking drying up the supply.
The current supply will not dry up much at all, when the tokens used for staking will be given away from the team. Am I wrong? Just trying to understand