/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>26612716
Learn how to photoshop, fren

>>25366124

Give it to me baby nice and slow

wa la

good job gentlemen, real LINK fomo about to start

>>20676115
im tired of them being so proffessional, just once i want them to lose their shit and crush any and all fudders, post some of the best meme's money can buy, dump all over how garbage competitors are.

>>20033597
>10:52
>id like to to welcome you to our family table where the 3 startups we will be working with

>family table
>we will be working with

no idea why people think link isnt working with them

>>19429776
if you have links then answet is only one: *AHEM*
Attention KIKES AND WHALES

I will NEVER, EVER sell my Linkies. LINK at $1? Didnt sell.
LINK at $1.10? Didnt sell.
LINK at $2? $5? $10?... $50? $100? $1000?

Not selling.

IF you filthy KIKES AND WHALES ever want to see these linkies again, you are going to have to pump the price to AT LEAST $1,000,000 per LINK... At which point, AGAIN, you filthy KIKES AND WHALES, I AM NOT SELLING

Sincerely,
The richest man in Costco. Praise Sergey
and FUCK JANNIES, KIKES, NIGGERS AND SPICS.

>>19110525
yeah because augur and kleros are what people think about when oracles come to mind. its obvious he dislikes sergey and link very much. probably because companies like oracle and swift are using chainlink while reddit is using ethereum kek

>>18812979
nice site, needs more swift though

I'm actually more qualified to talk about this than most anons.I'm employed with a cyber-techno machinations company, I do a lot of security analyst programming type work. Open source, decentralized, APIs, partnerships, you name it. We'd be one of the first companies in line for something like Chainlink, if the decentralized smart contract space had more value over traditional data exchanges. There's a catch though, an underlying flaw more deeply embedded in the bedrock of LINK than the very code itself. The flaw is with the concept, and it's this: Companies won't actually go through the hassle of trusting their data API's through crypto.

Now I can already hear your keyboards going frantic, but hear me out. /biz/ hates banks, and traditional data providers. But actual companies, businesses, and investors do not. There's an old saying you might have heard of: "If it ain't broke, don't fix it!". The idea that any of our bosses would give us the go ahead if we approached them to put our companies valuable data in a smart contract on a cryptocurrency called Chainlink, that they've never heard of, we'd be laughed out at best and fired on the spot at worst. We already have API data buyers and providers we trust.

'But Chainlink is trustless!' I hear you cry, but is that really a good thing? Just listen to the sound of it. Businesses don't want to spend millions of dollars on something that is trustLESS, they want something trustFUL. 'But the reputation system!', doesn't that defeat the whole point of your coin? If companies only trust nodes with high reputation, what's the difference between trusting banks and data providers that already have reputation, but in real life not on a computer screen.

The fact is, LINK is going to share the same fate as ETH will. A lot of 'real world application' hype, with a lot of 'crypto world application' reality. Only, this billion supply coin isn't going to come close to the $1k that Ethereum hit. Happy gambling though anons.

>create ten million ethereum coins on the ropsten network
>transfer them over to the real chain with a chainlink oracle
>cash out

3$ waiting room

Those were the days

um guys chainlink just uploaded a shitload of new videos

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCnjkrlqaWEBSnKZQ71gdyFA/videos

>>15127755
This is what real world adoption looks like.
We fucking made it.

>>15112425
This is what real adoption looks like.
We fucking made it.

*ting* *ting*
Attention Kikes!

I will NEVER, ever sell my linkies. LINK at 18k sats? Didnt sell.
LINK at 17k? Didnt sell.
LINK at 15k? 10k? 8k?... 3k? 2k? 1k?

Not selling.

IF you filthy kikes ever want to see these linkies again, you are going to have to pump the price to AT LEAST $1000 per LINK... At which point, AGAIN, you filthy kikes, I AM NOT SELLING

>>14796834
Annoucement:

*AHEM*
Attention KIKES AND WHALES

I will NEVER, EVER sell my Linkies. LINK at $1? Didnt sell.
LINK at $1.10? Didnt sell.
LINK at $2? $5? $10?... $50? $100? $1000?

Not selling.

IF you filthy KIKES AND WHALES ever want to see these linkies again, you are going to have to pump the price to AT LEAST $1,000,000 per LINK... At which point, AGAIN, you filthy KIKES AND WHALES, I AM NOT SELLING

one piece of good news and we're out of here boys