/biz/ - Business & Finance

HBAR is an extremely interesting one, with partnerships out the wazoo, almost to the extent that you think this could end up being utilized by the NWO or WEF. The problems with HBAR are its tokenomics and distribution, as well as its corporate oriented decentralization model. HBAR basically is built to operate with mega nodes ran by corporations such as Google.

These associations are not exactly that bullish for me, not to mention goes against the entire philosophy of cryptocurrency, but it does seem like it would be wise to at least pick up a suicide stack of the stuff.

>>28769618
Okay, but if they are overdone this time I am gonna be mad, anon-kun!!!

>>28766131
Fuck off retard. Hashies are based. But if you want gains you need to invest in the correct order. Right now the news is immediately bullish for Nano: >>28761725

>>28660723
ill send it in this thread, post a nano address and ill send it your way. I recommend the Natrium wallet from the Google app store

>>28538849
I know, but I also know things that you likely don't as well. HBAR is def bullish, ty google. But Nano is even more bullish, ty Mastercard.

If I am lucky I will sell maybe 2000 nano at the next local top and pick up some HBAR before the conference. HBAR is just too low key to go crazy right now, even with the 400 btc volume. Nano usually has been trading at 100 btc volume on binance, and anytime that volume spikes it leads to significant profits. Tokenomics are good, but having a non inflationary asset combined with a rabid community wanting to hold until $1000 EOY = it doesn't take much force to go higher.

I still love you hashies, for many of the same reasons I love nano

>>27412925
Same reason I am invested in HBAR, they are both lightning fast, can process low to zero fee transactions that can scale to meet the economy at large. Only difference is that NANO is a pure currency coin, is more decentralized than HBAR, and is open source. HBAR alternatively can handle smart contracts, which NANO cannot on the base protocol layer.

I am invested into both because they are superior assets to BTC and ETH, respectively.

>>27409257
Depends what shitcoins you own. As I am sure you can tell by my portfolio, I am betting on the ability for a crypto to scale, handle transactions quickly, and perform the needed functions without a significant or even noticeable cost.

Nano basically has zero sacrifices here aside from no smart contracts, which is why it is something like 95% of my stack. It has a real chance to be a btc killer. At the very least, it is a lightning network killer.

Hedera Hashgraph is pretty neat too, but definitely sacrifices decentralization for scalability. Not as confident in this one, but I think it has the potential to be a real eth killer. If my Nano stack moons first, I will likely pick up a fatter stack of some of these delicious hashies.

OOOHHH HASHIES~

Just bought 100k, am I gonna make it bros?

Are you going to finish those gains :3

*boops ur tum tum* x3 ^.^

*boops ur noes* :3
*boops ur cheek* ;p
*boops ur tum tum* x3 ^.^
teehee ^W^

>>19314023
>He thinks he is going to make it with a real girl who won't destroy his legacy and gains

Real Hashies only fuck 2d women

OHHHH HASHIES!!!~

How many hashies to make it?

Don't tell me you sold the reserve currency of the New World Order just when things were getting started! We have miles and miles to go <3

>>17714637