/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>23891718

for base protocol

also they've launched a protocol/marketplace for wrapped NFTs that lets you trade/farm them using the ERC20 standard, which is making my cock moderately hard

>>22499566

BUIDL

>programmable smart equities
>updatable/editable smart contracts post-deployment through its voting mechanism
>theoretically therefore updatable dapps of all kinds on the Ethereum blockchain
>invited to present at this year's edCON
>$5m mcap or some ridiculously low thing

It solves so many problems and the devs are workaholics seeking 0 hype

>>21404320

BUIDL -- $10m market cap at current, just about to exit stealth mode. It is going to be so huge, see pic.
ARTE -- NFT platform by developers of BUIDL, token pool receives liquidity from BUIDL
PAR - Parachute token, allows uniswap trading acoss the Telegram network
DEC - Decentr, interesting idea for users to monetize personal data
OCEAN - Holders of massive amounts of user/customer data can sell access to it (while automatically anonymizing it), while retaining control and storage over the actual data. Huge business use case. Partnership with Daimler Benz

>>21364690
DFO: a more flexible and decentralized version of a DAO. all DFOs are governed by a token

DFOhub: the platform used to publish and interact with DFOs. it is itself a DFO, hosted on DFOhub. all DFO's give a small % of equity to the DFOhub wallet

buidl: the governance token for DFOhub, which gives you both control over the network as well as control over those funds in the DFOhub wallet

>>21364686
there is a better spaced version of that pic now

>>21235813
I'll dump some info

Let me try and explain it as simply as possible. Say you write a contract that lets anyone send money to someones wallet, say, a charity. this is what it looks like

charityAddress = 0x123;

function () payable {
sendMoneyTo(charityAddress)
}

All money sent to the contract is rerouted to the charityAddress. Problem is, that charities wallet has changed in the past, and you assume in the future it might change again. If it does change, any money sent to the contract is useless, and you will need to publish a new one. So you write another bit of code instead

function changeAddress(address new) {
charityAddress = new;
}

Great, now we can change the address. Only problem is, it is on the blockchain, which means anyone can change the address, and set it to whatever they want. We don't want people to take advantage of that and scam charity money, so instead we write our own address into the contract as an owner, and put something like this in the changeAddress function

require(msg.sender == ownerAddress);

But this just means you have a single ownerAddress who can change the address whenever they want! that's not decentralized at all! So do you have a frail, easily broken contract with no central owner? Or a centralized contract where you have to trust the single owner?

DFOs let you have the best of both worlds. You can now give voting functionality to an ownership token that allows users to vote for changes. Rather than trusting the owner of the contract, a proposal to change the charityAddress is raised, and the people vote, and the address is changed. But this doesn't even start to cover it. With DFOhub and robe you can build totally decentralized, censorship proof site than can load on any web3 browser, front end on-chain and everything.

>>21195719

Allows parties to a smart contract to change smart contracts without have to scrap the whole thing and start all over from new, a massive advantage

If even 1% of DeFi projects use this, 500m mcap easy

>>21144340
allows contract development to take place in a decentralized fashion by means of a "lego" model of contract construction (i.e. microsevices) and a governance token which is used by the holders to vote for changes.

basically DAOs now have way way way more functionality and you don't need to trust founders anymore

>>21123109
building ERC-20's isn't even the beginning...

>>21112693
as a buidl holder you own 1.5% of the equity of every DFO, and one of those DFOs is about porn, so I guess you are invested in a porn token in the most technical sense of the word.

>>21002369

>>20899168

>>20876973
you don't program on the tokens themselves. the tokens are your share of the equity, and all of those equities are programmable. I want to post two images so this will be a two part post. so first off this is the structure of a DFO, each of these DFOs has governance tokens, so those tokens give equity in the DFO. this is a lot like most investments so far. you could have equity in bitcoin in the same way. but, if we look at the pic again, the equity IS the voting rights over programming. it's as if you not only have equity in the sense of ownership over a % of the supply, but ownership of the development of the equity itself. 1/2

>>20854113
have most of it in buidl, arte is just a side project. buidl is going to be worth a billion dollars one day and you can cap this. you have no fucking clue how big of a market share they are actively cornering while people still don't even comprehend that the market they are cornering can exist.

>>20849031
revolutionizes the way that DAOs are built and run
>>20849130
proof of concept means it's no longer just a concept. it means the concept has been proven in real life lmao. they have a working product anon, you can build a DFO today
dapp.dfohub.com

>>20816467
>Devs took weeks to fix exploit
devs didn't fix it, it was fixed through a vote, proving the use case of DFOs. remember this image? the broken part was the rewards

>>20813474
I agree. If Chainlink is priced fairly right now, buidl should be double the MC at least. it will be if the projects get built on DFOhub, just no two ways around it

image got updated again btw

Well anons? Do you get it yet?

>>20760875
>>20760927
pic related

>>20747383
spaced it out a bit more