/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>30319636
Stay poor then

>>29872048
The number of copycats also makes me bullish, also for defi to truly be decentralized we need a primitive currency that is not tied to fiat in any way.

It’s what Satoshi would have created if oracles existed in 2009

Here’s vitalik shilling AMPL:
https://twitter.com/AmplMemeGod/status/1364265080829992965?s=20

Here’s Friedrich Hayek theorizing a perfect money that sounds just like AMPL:
https://youtu.be/9-uo-KfnkhI

Here’s vitalik shilling AMPL:
https://twitter.com/AmplMemeGod/status/1364265080829992965?s=20

Here’s Friedrich Hayek theorizing a perfect money that sounds just like AMPL:
https://youtu.be/9-uo-KfnkhI [Open]

Here’s a research paper about how an elastic rebase token would be better than bitcoin:
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/Data_Integrity_Notice.cfm?abid=2425270

And check my OP pic, AMPL is literally what Satoshi would have made if oracles had existed in 2009.

What am I missing? Not trying to shill. Honest question. AMPL seems like a new paradigm.

It’s the digital cash that Satoshi envisioned when he created bitcoin. But bitcoin because if it’s fixed supply ended up becoming more akin to a precious metal. And asset backed stablecoins like RSV or USDT are retarded and have no future.

Here’s vitalik shilling AMPL:
https://twitter.com/AmplMemeGod/status/1364265080829992965?s=20

Here’s Friedrich Hayek theorizing a perfect money that sounds just like AMPL:
https://youtu.be/9-uo-KfnkhI

Here’s a research paper about how an elastic rebase token would be better than bitcoin:
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/Data_Integrity_Notice.cfm?abid=2425270

And check my OP pic, AMPL is literally what Satoshi would have made if oracles had existed in 2009.

The way I see it RSV being backed by collateral is a deadly flaw, the ideal stablecoin should be backed by nothing but it’s own network, like Bitcoin

Also RSR cannot force a permanent reduction in coin supply, once demand growth flatlines.

Reminder that AMPL is what satoshi would have made if oracles existed at the time

>>27355996
Its what Satoshi Nakamoto would have developed BTC to be if LINK was around at the time.
So why own today?
It's one of the most promising DeFi building blocks, a form of diversification, and the team is in it to win it (i.e. pledged 10 years w/ the right backers):
https://www.ampleforth.org/roadmap/

>>27267397
screencap tells it all.
AMPL is what Satoshi Nakamoto would have developed bitcoin to be if chain link existed in 2009.

>>25643549
No. BTC behaves like a precious metal. It is extremely scarce.
AMPL is what BTC might have been if chainlink was available for Satoshi to leverage.

>>24251805
AMPL is what Satoshi Nakamoto would have designed BTC to be if LINK existed at that time. (ref screencap, in his own words)

http://p2pfoundation.ning.com/forum/topics/bitcoin-open-source