/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>22018599
>Sup 42, how were the shrooms?
fucking amazing
just got back from the cottage and was on a 5-day journey (my friend brought a strain "Penis Envy" that was developed by Terrence McKenna)
delved deep into Richard's book titled "NOW" and developed my understanding of time and space and light much more
I feel an epiphany coming, I suspect that physicists will be approaching me in a year or so asking how I knew. The realizations are indeed as simple as Richard describes:

>>22017435
>"Often the most difficult challenge is in asking the right questions. It is hard to know where the next physics revelations will appear. Einstein showed us that time is a suitable subject for physical study. I think he was unable to address the meaning of NOW for the simple reason that he refused to accept the notion that physics was incomplete.
>We may not soon understand the interplay between relativity and quantum physics or the meaning of measurement, but the issues are worthy of further attack. Advance is unlikely, in my mind, to require complex math or arcane philosophy. Whoever cracks open these problems will likely do so with some very simple examples, maybe using nothing more than algebra, perhaps referring to the little hand of a watch and where it points. It may happen when some simple experiment gives a result that is unexpected. When the next breakthrough happens, I predict it will take a regression to childhood, a way of looking at reality that focuses on something in physics that we don't even realize we're assuming is true, and turns it on its head. Who will this new Einstein be? You?

>>22018599
>Also have you looked into Kleros?
not yet, but it is on my to-do list