/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>11875706
> that's not a thing
Yes it is, the fact that you don't know this when it's an absolutely basic function of the system (mining rewards per block) really should clue you in that you have no idea what's going on
> nothing is impossible
Yes it is, pic related.
> ln only obfuscates (if) the number of transactions not the total flow (ie end result) not really a game changer in any way.
Wrong, if the central banks control the actual transaction layers, they can play the exact same scam on BTC that they played on gold that resulted in a 542:1 paper to physical gold ratio on comex.
> you see it permanent i see it as something that will give in to demand
And you are wrong, because you don't see what the actual purpose of the limit is. You are bluepilled as fuck.
> the entire point of ln is you never lose custody of your funds.
You never lose custody of 50k USD in your personal safe, either. That doesn't mean the purchasing power can't get fucked in the ass because of forex shenanigans by central banks. Exactly the same scenario with BTC.
> broadcast is inefficient as fuck
I didn't deny that it was, I simply pointed out that it was necessary if you wish to maintain complete audit of the supply at all times. You don't realise that it's necessary because you don't seem to even realise you have complete audit of the supply at all times prior to the blockstream sabotage. As someone that supposedly writes software I find that difficult to believe and think you sound like just any other retarded corecuck desperately trying to cling to a lie that was exposed outright beyond all reasonable doubt a year ago.

>>9574568